http://www.disney.com
tough job! :D
Printable View
http://www.disney.com
tough job! :D
Big Daddy? :unsure:
Wow thats good timing :rolleyes:
What is it with posting porn lately? Something no one ever used to do cept dips and n00bs :dry:
Jonno :cool:
It is Big Daddy using another username right? :unsure:
Wow!!!!!11111
Those pics are awesome, those chicks have to be the finest examples of womanhood I've ever seen. Great post :drool: :w00t:
I hope a mod doesn't delete the link http://moderation.forumflash.com/sty...efault/BBQ.gif
:nono::nono:..
Damn! This really shouldn't be posted...
but the brunettes are sweeeet :01:
its that blood i see on the first set of pictures :sick:
in b4 the lock...
voyuerism is badong :dry:
that's terrible if those girls don't know they were getting pics taken of them. :|
i didn't click the link :unsure:
You know Lynx, it doesn't help if you change the link but leave the text alone. Anyone can still copy and paste the address into their address bar.Quote:
Originally Posted by mad13
Not telling you how to do your job, but I thought I'd let you know. :D
EDIT: Oops! :blushing:
It also does not help if you copy the text into your post and let members, some of whom are very young, know how to access the link.:ph34r:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rip The Jacker
:crying:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
Whoa, Jacker pwns Lynx only to be pwned by Bob :01:
What do we do with the link again? :ermm:
btw, Lynx.... Nice link :lol: thats the sort of thing my mum would do :lol:
Jonno :cool:
I blame the parents.
Not the poster of the link nor the Filesharingtalk moderators.
If the parents were supervising their kids on the interweb or had installed appropriate net nanny software then minors viewing unappropriate content would not be a problem.
So, tell someone who cares :)
Manker, just out of curiousity, if I posted a link to a site full of naked men, kissing/stripping etc would you think it was ok?
Jonno :cool:
Thanx Rip;) - i didnt think about that - finally got to see what everyone was talking about:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Rip The Jacker
:unsure: I didn't see this one but if it was taken in the gym without consent it is wrong. For the kids as well as the girls involved.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
No :no:
Why Dan? how is it any different? :huh:
Jonno :cool:
I can honestly say that I wouldn't care.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
It's not to my taste so I'd close the browser but I'm not scared of naked men.
But it's wrong to post pics of people without their consent.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Hiya goddess :DQuote:
Originally Posted by *goddess*
It's a tanning salon site. I know an ickle bit about what happens and the cameras are shown live on t'internet from certain tanning places. The women can either pay to tan in private or go on the ones with cameras on them for free -- so the gils know all about it.
Sometimes the tanning site charges a membership fee to perv but other times it is used for promotion.
Of course there will always be some exhibitionist chicks who go nekkid :01:
Agreed :music:Quote:
Originally Posted by *goddess*
Most voyuer sites on the 'net involve girls that are actually paid for what they do. It's all fake really, just looks like the real stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by *goddess*
I wouldn't know myself of course, DanB told me...
:) Ok, thanks for the clarification Manker and Cheese. Long as their aware and have agreed more power to em.
:rolleyes: Dan said you'd say that Cheese:P
That's not quite what I meant, I'm personally not offended by anything thats been posted, I simply think it's wrong to do so on a public "Open" forum, we've been talking about closing the forum to guests, I wonder how many guests have/will/might come in, see that and simply think this is a place to post porn, therefore not joining, just another reason apart from consent of those in the pics (yes I read your explination) and the fact that youngsters may see it, would you be happy if your child saw it when 11 or 12?Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
You say about parent controls, so either you don't allow to view forums or risk them seeing that. Would parent controls pick up all the sites posted?
Jonno :cool:
If someone posted pictures of their penis on the board that would really piss me off.
Especially if they were the sanctimonious lecturing type of person.
i remember days when links like that had sideeffects
i am grateful it can now be discussed instead of killed
I'd not allow my pre-teenage son or daughter to visit a forum like this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
I don't talk like this when chatting to my neices IRL so I wouldn't want them to see people typing like it. Net Nanny would have blocked the above link, anyway.
I'm serious when I say that I put the blame on parents if minors see inappropriate content on the interweb. I'd put porn out of reach IRL so I'd take similar precautions online. It's not rocket science to install net-nanny.
Btw, I'm not saying that I want porn posted here, far from it. Rather than I believe that it will always happen in a place that is moderated with a velvet glove rather than an iron hand due to the overwhelming prevalence of online porn. So if you're going to let your kid post here without net-nanny, he or she is going to see some naked people.
If it happens, deal with it. It's your fault.
thik of the children, please think of the children :crying:
Did you think of the children when you posted your cawk? No, so shut up, there is no way you can lecture on what should and shouldnt be posted when you have done that in the past.
The word hypocrite springs to mind
Cleverly stated Cheese, but there's no difference cept I only posted 1 pic and it was only on for 4 mins :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Seen by 6 people before it was removed, each one I knew and no one was offended except someone who heard about it and aired his views 6 months later.
Was also just a pic of the male form, nothing sexual about it as the pic I posted would be acceptable on uk tv before 10pm under the "Mull of kytyre rule" :) But like I say, you frown upon that because it's male.
Anyway, the links posted were porn, xxx, not soft but full on, and I'm sorry I just think it's wrong to be openly posted.
Jonno :cool:
It was removed after 4 mins by myself and I recieved 2 warnings for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanB
Jonno :cool:
Fucking hypocrite.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
And how dare you assume I'd be offended because it's the male form, you know fuck all about me so please to be shutting the fuck up.
How was it full xxx porn you muppet, it was women on a sun bed :blink:
lol, wow now who's getting out of his pram :lol:
Also I don't recall anyone complaining when Ron posted Nikki's pics.
@Dan..... You did'nt answer my question :)
Jonno :cool:
Edit: Dan. ..... Erm, a woman laid legs spread is classed ass xxx, it would'nt be shown in softcore porn movies. Besides, I refering to several posts, not just this one :)
Dan, Maybe he means the link to pics bigdaddy put up?