Printable View
Pope John Paul II was a musician in the 60's Here is an album cover of one of his masterpieces... Who would of guessed!
The harmonies...were done by the Catholic Pedophiles, a little know barbershop
quartet. (from Detroit)
Rawk on!...:sick:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...sturbation.bmp
Peace bd
Not funny... :no:
No it's not. Hence my use of satire to poke fun at an institution, that has ignored the heinous crimes commited by it's leadership...for centuries.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
Peace bd
satire is supposed to be funny though aint it
somewhat amusing, but i cant read the title on the record.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brotherdoobie
Thanks, BD.
I once said it without the fun poking part and got flamed for blasphemy.
And ignoring is slightly understated.
Yogi
I think this is disgusting. An apology should be made to all barber shop quartets everywhere. :(
I suppose if the forum is allowed to poke fun at Yasser Arafat, which I complained about, then it must be allowed to poke fun at this subject.
http://www.rikk-cowsys.com/style_emo...lt/huhpmsl.gif classic...........Quote:
An apology should be made to all barber shop quartets everywhere
The Ministers QuartetQuote:
Originally Posted by mogadishu
I have BD on ignore because he depresses me, is this worth taking it off to have a look? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
probly not...
i dont think ive seen anything about yasser arafat on here :ermm:
tbh about things i dont be believe the occupation of priesthood makes you more likely to be a peadophile than other professions. i the last few years weve caught at least 3 musical nonces out. if anyway can find me statistical evidence to prove that priest=monster, do post.
btw i am feeling grumpy, stfu
Trolling then?Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Ok.
I dont think or hope that no one is suggesting that priest equals monster. There has been a lot of press recently in the UK and the USA about child abuse by roman Catholic priests. Not helped by the Church denial. This may be the the reason for the introduction of this thread. People must remember that you are going to have this type of thing in any profession where men are 'in charge' of boys. The percentage of priests involved is miniscule, nevertheless undesireable, in comparison to the vast majority of decent hard working people in the priesthood. The same thing occurs in the scout movement and people in charge of youth football. These paedophiles join these organisations for the sole purpose of furthering their evil interests. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
kinda thinking along those lines
It concerns about 4 % of the group, wich is, shocking enough, average....(alsoQuote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
in other proffessions........)
In the us, however, there are 40.000 priests..........
Most of the abusers were not known pedophiles before they joint the
priesthood.
My biggest blame towards the leaders is the fact it was covered up, not
ignored. Known offenders were relocated in the past, hence given a new
playground to mess with.
Same thing happened with social workers in the sixties.
Mind you, not all childabusers are pedophiles by nature.
In many cases the -sad or sick- circumstances makes the criminal.
Offending priests live in an unnatural environment, with unnatural rules.
Just like not all jailbirds taking the backentrance of their cellmates are gay.
As long as humanity fails to build a healthy society, we'll have to live with the
remains of that failure.
That 'll be for quite some while, i fear.
Yogi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi
Bit contradictory. If it was the specific environment that makes them more likely to offend then shouldn't the percentage be above the national average.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Those specific circumstances also occur in other area's than just the
examples mentioned.
So 4% is an average for jobs that involve a position of trust and deal with young lads on a one to one basis?
You should have said. What's the national average for other jobs, like office workers and air hostesses.
Sorry, Manker, i'm not going there.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
:blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi
Fair enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
:)
Peace bd
Quote:
Originally Posted by brotherdoobie
:01: A remark like cheesehead made would make my day too............
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi
Sorry Yogi, I only block dull people. I don't think you could ever claim to be dull...
Annoying as feck yes... :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Granted. :D
Though i think the same of BD..............Never a dull moment...........:P
Yogi
Edit:The annoying as feck part i regard a compliment, coming from you, that is.........
So now I'm depressing and dull....It keeps getting better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Withcheese
Peace :cool:
i think cheebus can see it if i quote itQuote:
Originally Posted by brotherdoobie
I think the whole ignore charade is to give expression to his fear of reflection by BD........Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
Looking inside ones soul...can be frightening!Quote:
Originally Posted by Yogi
@cheese...Try looking through the hole, in the bottom of an old shoe first.
Reflections of the soul...through a sole.
It will change your perspective.
Peace bd :)
you need to get off them drugs
I am currently drug free...mabey that's my problem!Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
Nah...my imagination has always been hyper-active. :D
Peace bd
Quote:
my imagination has always been hyper-active
Likewise here. :01:
Not the drugfree part, though.......... :whistling