do you go with evolution or creationism ?
Printable View
do you go with evolution or creationism ?
Evolution baby. If god exists,then were all fucked.
Creationism.
Evolution, Jim, but not as we know it...
:)
evolution takes too long so fuk it
creationism
we dont have wings but we can still fly thanks to creationism :P
Evolution.
Having said that, just because God is unlikely to exist doesn't mean that we weren't created... ;)
I thought that the Media decided on what is true or not? :blink:
if that is true then it is creationism, no? :blink:
creation isn't even a theory
evolution is putting together bits we know and filling in the blanks with possibilities, hence it's a theory.
creation is using no evidence other than a book of metaphors designed to enforce morals on the world.
which is harder to believe, hydrogen floating around in space or whatever it was and made the big bang. or. some being that lived forever decided he was bored and made earth then the oceans, the sky, the animals, the people, then sat back and thought that is good?
There's also the fact that the material used for the theory on creationism has been rewritten numerous times. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
The theory of evolution has had its changes, but they were mainly new items of knowledge based on the original stuff ;)
Well, to be honest, if that's the choice, then neither of the above! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
You really haven't got a clue, have you... :no:
I think voting for "a bit of both" requires an sort of explanation or clarifiction....? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by 15%
Both.
I don't see creationism is considered a science. It's a belief and that's all it can be.
I believe God created the science and that science, as we know today, should be taught in school.
I think creationists are looking for magic or something.
Even the sky or something was created in a day....it shouldn't be taught in school because it can't be proven or even hypothesized so why bother? :huh:
Creationists need a "head out of the ass" moment.
Imagine a whole science week devoted to Biblical creation. It wouldn't get past...............the Bible. :dry:
i regarded Creationism not as the "act of god"Quote:
Originally Posted by barbarossa
but more the creationism by man as in creativity and creative minds thus creating the world and its history as we see fit, into what ever we want to believe even though we still dont have all the facts.
Like wise with "evolution", is man not also controlling it in a non "natural" way (aka:creativity as in "cultural" way (look at holland)) creation of technology, weapons & its effect on this planet, animals, deforestation, shoes - and their effect on our feet etc etc
and then of course we have the media
[img]http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/a...961028_400.jpg
http://i.timeinc.net/time/magazine/a...940314_400.jpg[/img]
Well that's all well in good but it's not what the poll is about. :dry:Quote:
Originally Posted by 15%
........but you knew that and decided to invent a rationale.
exactly. the Loop is now complete - hence i am the true entity of Creationism
and therefore i choose both
nope :01:Quote:
Originally Posted by barbarossa
I have my doubts. :(
I think evolution wins. Who would create something that can get caught in a zip. :(
:lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by bigboab
I think we descended from crashed Aliens.... :whistling
As good a starting point as any...but how did the aliens begin?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sara
erm...oh yeah...didn't think of that one.... :blushing:
Wait! I know the answer!!!!
42
:lol: :lol:
It never ceases to amaze me how many people have read that bookQuote:
Originally Posted by Sara
Possibly a robotic space probe was sent over vast distances for reasearch purposes, and crash-landed on a planetoid whose atmosphere and surface composition was made up of organic chemicals, what you might call a primordial soup... ripe for the genesis of life..Quote:
Originally Posted by Sara
..Now what if the space probe was contaminated with virii or bacteria from that space probe's home planet, and the virii or bacteria, finding itself in ideal conditions, began to multiply....
Sound familiar? :cool2:
maybe we invent a time machine the day before doomsday then a few people go back in time and start again. no beginning, no end; simple
Yes. Simple. I think you can get most of the components for a time machine from Woolworths. :frusty:Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
That's ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by barbarossa
Everyone knows that you can't buy a DeLorean in Woolworths :dry:
nu-uh. what happens is the time machine ends the world and the only voyage ever is to 10000 bc.
logical, don't you think? all questions are answered
Take it back another 5000 years and that would explain a lot :DQuote:
Originally Posted by TheDave
I like your theory, Dave.
Sounds to me like some sort of perpetual motion machine through time and space.
I'm not sure the Timelords of Gallifrey would approve.
The gayest sounding time travelling race. Ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chebus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sara
OK that would explain female drivers .... hmmm :whistling
yeah...it would make sense of the roswell crash as well....female alien driving :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggles
Do what? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Stanley Kubricks view of the dawn of man is quite interesting
http://img179.exs.cx/img179/2766/pdvd0349sv.jpg