why use winzip when winrar will do just the same as zip but more.. and in the xp you have a zip utilty built in....
Printable View
why use winzip when winrar will do just the same as zip but more.. and in the xp you have a zip utilty built in....
this should be in software
i prefer stuffit browser [which is alladin product]
i think it's mostly about interface preferences
i'd like an app which made many small zip files of a directory!
Zip, ZAP, ZOOPP!
Howabout WINACE??? That's a pretty good pakking/unpakking prog.
Seems pretty efficient, too. I don't like winzip's interface, anyway.WINARC has a better i.f. so does WINACE
W.A. is worth a try.... oh , well...just a thought...blblblblbblblblblblblblblblblblbi...heehaw!
H.H. ;)
The xp built-in utility its so strange ,takes 10 minutes to unzip a file ,yeah winzip is good but can't unzip the rar files ,winrar is the best but you need a crack for,the best and is freeware is IZarc that unzip a lot of files such rar,zip,arj and more ,try it .
My vote is definitely for Winace...Ive been using it for years, and it will unpack just about anything.
winrar all the way
PowerArchiver is my choice for an all around archiving utility.
Good for zipping programs and making them self-extracting exe's to put on k-lite :)
HERE is their website.
BTW, it's on kaz. also.
Steve
i use WinZip, WinRAR and WinACE and they are all good but the buit in XP one is shit
I use winzip jsut for zip files, and winrar for unzipping a load of zips at one time, (faster i think).
i just use winzip for fimilarity