i like how people post, "no cheaters," as part of the giveaway rules....as if the cheaters are going to see that and be like, "fuck, now i can't participate," and move on. :lol:
Printable View
i like how people post, "no cheaters," as part of the giveaway rules....as if the cheaters are going to see that and be like, "fuck, now i can't participate," and move on. :lol:
Yeh, its not the greatest idea ever, i'm sure i've done it before though :P The rule where you can't have been a member of the tracker before is pretty redundant too, you just have to take these things on trust
It is pretty damn funny to put things like that in. It's almost as silly as saying "no lefties allowed to participate". It's completely a waste of text.
checking their rep and post history on FST is the least we can do.
You are quite right Tiantian. A Giveaway is not necessarily a totally blind affair. We do have somethings that help us decide...
If a guy is a good member at FST I can't see why he shouldn't be a good member elsewhere.
I gave the odd invite to a noob but sometimes I know him from somewhere else...
Tiantian has a point,checking the history of each member its the only thing that you can assure you a bit if a member deserve an invite
u still can't find out that if the member with high reputation changes his mind and become a trader:) ;)
or if he is a trader somewhere else :);)but not on this forum :)