Re: What sites are worth what.
Re: What sites are worth what.
I personally think that it is quite correct in my opinion anyway...way to go!!!
Re: What sites are worth what.
WB (3)
TT(3)
potuk(3)
pisexy(4 atm):P
btw good idea...
Re: What sites are worth what.
syD your 2 cents worth a lot more...
Re: What sites are worth what.
That kind of rating doesn't make sense to me, I got my u*-* account - which is the most valiuable in the torrent market, by giving not many - invites to oink and btmusic. So I think that everyone has the right to try his luck.
Re: What sites are worth what.
I think that FSC might be in the 4 (or maybe like a 3.5) range- it has a small userbase [3000 users], so it is very hard to upload. Also- one must manually request invites, and if a mod is kind enough and your share ratios are excellent, you will get some- but thats just my opinion on that one tracker.
Re: What sites are worth what.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Evandro
That kind of rating doesn't make sense to me, I got my u*-* account - which is the most valiuable in the torrent market, by giving not many - invites to oink and btmusic. So I think that everyone has the right to try his luck.
you admit it yourself that it is the most valuable tracker (hence my 5 rating) so what exactly are you complaining about dude?
trades are not always done by exchanging sites of equal importance (otherwise noone would ever get u***), and noone can ask users to do that, it is their own decision what they will give their invites for. i have merely listed some sites and their current trade value according to myself, ppl still do whaterver they desire with their invites.
EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
aburyach
I think that FSC might be in the 4 (or maybe like a 3.5) range- it has a small userbase [3000 users], so it is very hard to upload. Also- one must manually request invites, and if a mod is kind enough and your share ratios are excellent, you will get some- but thats just my opinion on that one tracker.
actually, you're right, there are quite a few sites out there that are rarer than the 3 rating but not quite in the 4 league. so i think the 3.5 category is called for. i think pisexy (atm, as Xsensei noted) would fit into that category aswell.
Re: What sites are worth what.
Quote:
so what exactly is your point again?
I said it already. Offer whatever you have no matter where you want to get in. If I were lucky enought to get u*-* then everyone has the chance.
Quote:
trades are not always done by exchanging sites of equal importance (otherwise noone would ever get u***)
I saw ppl offering all the greatest sites for u*** including TB as well as ScT and many other great sites and that's why I feel so lucky now.
@aburyach I don't see many ppl offering invites to FSC probably because those smart ones know that they can't give them to the first better person that they met. And I don't think that is so hard to upload at FSC.
Re: What sites are worth what.
@Evandro- you contribute a valid argument. You might be reffering to a recent thread of mine that involved me trading FSC invites; so I will address it here. There was only one person that I gave the invite to- and that person (not mentioning him/her here) had over 300+ posts and showed me ratios of 2+ on 4 torrent sites. Uploading at FSC is very subjective- it depends on what files you grab and your UL speed. I usually only download the files with less peers (as they are usually almost always exclusive to FSC), so seeding back can be a challenge sometimes.