-
I keep meeting people who use their PCs extensively and still insist on using 800 x 600 pixel res!
self sabotaging ludites using product like photoshop/illustrator and protools which have way too many tool palets
i run 1280 x 1024 on a crap sampo alphascan 17 inch [i'd run higher on a better display]
and use up to 1600 x 1200 + 1024 x 768 on Mac using quark and BBedit
i of course design with 800 X 600 or less in mind for http, which is a real drag [but good for bandwidth]
what res do you run?
if 800 X 600 or less why?
do you know that you can see more information on screen in a higher res?
-
i use 1024x768. it's nice. 800 is too small and any bigger res is well too big, i cant see what it says on the screen! :P :D
-
i run 1024*768, on my laptop. my brothers desktop is set at 800*600
-
1280 x 1024
My gfx card cant handle anymore or the monitor, at one of my friends I switch to 1600 x 1200
-
1024x768 so i can spot anything on my screen without using binoculars... :lol:
-
only 1024x768...till i get a bigger monitor, then i plan to go to 1280x1024 Seen a nice 19" monitor....hmm..
-
my desktop is running 2 x 1280*1024, my laptop is at 1024*768
-
Im using 17 inch and one of my friends has 19 inch, use 1600 x 1200 on 19, looks like 1280 x 1024 on 17
-
i'm running 1600x1200x32 on my 22" flatscreen crt moniter, and i'm running 1280x1024x32 on my 19" lcd moniter. both hooked up to my pc. I use the crt moniter when i'm gaming, and i use the lcd moniter for everything else. while there both hooked up at the same time. i have it as a single moniter hook up. basically what displays on one moniter displays on the other moniter.
-
I use 1024 x 768, 800 x 600 is a no go for me at all.
http://hometown.aol.co.uk/Pumpencum/...re_us_n00b.gif