Printable View
I can see. They didn't make 400 million dollars. Yes, they are hurting...
The storyQuote:
As for "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King," it has now earned $312 million after four weekends. It passed the $300 million mark on Friday, outpacing its 2002 predecessor...
Guys, we must give up p2p.
even with broadband i would still go to a cinema
u cannot compare the quality
True but $9.75 for a ticket rip offQuote:
Originally posted by CoolMac@11 January 2004 - 21:55
even with broadband i would still go to a cinema
u cannot compare the quality
True but $9.75 for a ticket rip off [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Rock Tonic Juice Magic+12 January 2004 - 04:59--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rock Tonic Juice Magic @ 12 January 2004 - 04:59)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-CoolMac@11 January 2004 - 21:55
even with broadband i would still go to a cinema
u cannot compare the quality
4 u
4 me $2 :lol:
312 mills eh? how much did it take to make the damn movie?
100? lol
givmme a break :lol:
and besides i went to threatre to watch LORTROTK
i use p2p to watch and see if the movies is good, if i like i get the dvd and watch it over and over again in my tv
but I want to hurt the movie industry!
who would make movies then? :oQuote:
Originally posted by Sid Hartha@12 January 2004 - 05:14
but I want to hurt the movie industry!
Canadians :lol:
Canadians make better moviez anyways <_<
i dunnoQuote:
Originally posted by james_bond_rulez@12 January 2004 - 05:40
Canadians :lol:
Canadians make better moviez anyways <_<
I only download movies I'd never pay to see anyway, so I'm not hurting anybody. In fact after I watch a movie, I usually thank God I didn't pay for it. Maybe the industry should try a little harder to make good movies, instead of all these 'by the numbers' blockbusters that rely so heavily on force-fed advertising to draw people into the theaters. And yes, LOTR got my money and it was well deserved.
I thought the same thing, I heard the third one made up for it's production costs in just a week or something, and by then it had only been up in the US.Quote:
Originally posted by Spindulik@12 January 2004 - 05:49
I can see. They didn't make 400 million dollars. Yes, they are hurting...
The storyQuote:
As for "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King," it has now earned $312 million after four weekends. It passed the $300 million mark on Friday, outpacing its 2002 predecessor...
Everything since then is pure profits, I can't even imagine how much it'll make when it comes out on DVD.
I went to see it though, and I can see why it's doing so well.
Many movies made today are of good quality and most people would happily watch them. Howver to gain reasonable revenue to from said movies then they must be of exceptional quality.
True but $9.75 for a ticket rip off [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Rock Tonic Juice Magic+11 January 2004 - 21:59--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Rock Tonic Juice Magic @ 11 January 2004 - 21:59)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-CoolMac@11 January 2004 - 21:55
even with broadband i would still go to a cinema
u cannot compare the quality
you think thats bad? here is $16.00 for a ticket
you think thats bad? here is $16.00 for a ticket [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Keikan+12 January 2004 - 16:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Keikan @ 12 January 2004 - 16:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by Rock Tonic Juice Magic@11 January 2004 - 21:59
<!--QuoteBegin-CoolMac
Quote:
@11 January 2004 - 21:55
even with broadband i would still go to a cinema
u cannot compare the quality
True but $9.75 for a ticket rip off
Damn. It's $6.50 here. :D
even if i like the mivie i can not watch it more then once dats jus boring 2 meQuote:
Originally posted by xxxSHARExxx@12 January 2004 - 05:14
i use p2p to watch and see if the movies is good, if i like i get the dvd and watch it over and over again in my tv
you think thats bad? here is $16.00 for a ticket [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Keikan+13 January 2004 - 00:43--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Keikan @ 13 January 2004 - 00:43)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by Rock Tonic Juice Magic@11 January 2004 - 21:59
<!--QuoteBegin-CoolMac
Quote:
@11 January 2004 - 21:55
even with broadband i would still go to a cinema
u cannot compare the quality
True but $9.75 for a ticket rip off
in houston at the Majic Johnson Theatre its only $5
who would make movies then? :o [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by CoolMac+12 January 2004 - 01:30--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (CoolMac @ 12 January 2004 - 01:30)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Sid Hartha@12 January 2004 - 05:14
but I want to hurt the movie industry!
Well, if you saw "Final Fantasy", the only real actors were the voice overs. Pretty soon, your Hollywood movie star is going to be a virtual being, created with a computer, just like the "Dead or Alive" babes.
Which reminds me. Has anyone ever downloaded Virtual Victoria? You know, the computer generated babe that you can pose and dress up, even nude. Anatomically correct. Photo realistic :D
:lol:
Cinema $2
Rent a Movie $1.50
got things cheap