Re: not sure where this goes
maybe u should give them -1 in the reputation if that happens or something...
i don't think anything else can be done (and next time u offer something they will be in u'r black list)
Re: not sure where this goes
i know that but getting it off my chest made me feel better
Re: not sure where this goes
yea, well, theres not much one could do about it... I guess what their thinking is getting as many less rated sites they can and then trade them in for something better than they actually want...
Re: not sure where this goes
Weve thought about allowing negative reputation for those that have been members on the site for two months and have at least 25 posts. We could even add to that they need at least +5 on rep points. We had chosen against negative points since it appeared to have more drawbacks then good. Though its still a possiblity...
Re: not sure where this goes
reality thank you for policing this thread. all other trading threads are full of scammers, but there are next to none on this site. thanks
Re: not sure where this goes
me too it happened with pisexy...but what the hell not to much to do about it...
Re: not sure where this goes
The negative negative rep would be nice to have but need to have some requirements. The member for 2 months is good requirement as well as the +5 rep. There also needs to be some consequences for abusing the system as well.
Re: not sure where this goes
Whilst not in the same league as scamming or cheating if you give away an invite to someone who then tries trading it instead of using it themselves they are playing with your reputation so if they end up giving it to a cheat, for example, the end result is the same as if you'd given it to the cheat yourself.
Something needs to be done but not sure about negative feedback. I'm sure that Reality would consider a warning or disabled priviliges if a report was made.
Re: not sure where this goes
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ghurka
Whilst not in the same league as scamming or cheating if you give away an invite to someone who then tries trading it instead of using it themselves they are playing with your reputation so if they end up giving it to a cheat, for example, the end result is the same as if you'd given it to the cheat yourself.
Something needs to be done but not sure about negative feedback. I'm sure that Reality would consider a warning or disabled priviliges if a report was made.
my point:)