Christian Pornography

[mjmacky]

I think he was meaning to upset me, but clearly has no idea how. If only he could use more words, I'm sure there will an ample amount of stupidity to follow, and I do find stupidity quite upsetting.

Not everything is about you. I know why he did it, I was just wondering what his rationale would be concerning the apparently disproportionate retort.

obtw, you just committed the cardinal internets sin: calling someone stupid while concurrently fucking up the sentence.

At least I remember how I originally wrote it (this time).

"I'm sure there's stupidity to follow". I didn't think it properly characterized an amount and felt it needed a change in tense. Seems I missed a non suicide.

[Snee]

Attachment 115859

Yeah, fuck those pedophiles with their nine year old wives.

Oh, wait, I was thinking of Muhammed.

[ckrit]

I am, in all honesty, liking the though process behind this thread.

1) Some guy who's nearly fluent in english posts a thread containing a fairly harmless joke about Islam in the title. cabbar probably doesn't even understand the joke completely, but...

2) cabbar, who takes his religion very srsly, becomes deeply offended.

3) cabbar then immediately assumes that said guy must be christian, because of ???

4) ...and sets out to offend christians right the fuck back.

5) Having slept through any english lessons he might have had, cabbar resorts to posting images he found through google...

6) ...and, not being a rocket surgeon, he tries to make the connection christianity = pedophilia, or christian religious leaders = pedophiles...

7) ...which might not be one of the very best angles, if in a "my ruleegion is bettar then urs"-type of argument, and your own religion happens to be Islam.


Or

1) cabbar is trolling, and misjudged his target audience/is a moron.



Either way, it's beautiful in its dave-like simplicity.

[Squeamous]

Am I missing something? Posting a poorly constructed retort hardly seems disproportionate to anything. Unless you're suggesting cabbar ought to have tried harder

[megabyteme]

Am I missing something? Posting a poorly constructed retort hardly seems disproportionate to anything. Unless you're suggesting cabbar ought to have tried harder

cabbar should have at least figured out what his target was before firing off his only rock(et).

[ckrit]

Am I missing something? Posting a poorly constructed retort hardly seems disproportionate to anything. Unless you're suggesting cabbar ought to have tried harder

You don't reckon calling a bunch of dudes pedos and posting some pic of a burd sticking a cross up her bum is a bit of an overly ambitious response to mary trying to make people post pics of their ankles, then?

[LemOnzoo]

I'm agnostic, but this topic is to sick. Moderators please lock it.

[manker]

No.

[manker]

Am I missing something? Posting a poorly constructed retort hardly seems disproportionate to anything. Unless you're suggesting cabbar ought to have tried harder

You don't reckon calling a bunch of dudes pedos and posting some pic of a burd sticking a cross up her bum is a bit of an overly ambitious response to mary trying to make people post pics of their ankles, then?

This.

[Squeamous]

You don't reckon calling a bunch of dudes pedos and posting some pic of a burd sticking a cross up her bum is a bit of an overly ambitious response to mary trying to make people post pics of their ankles, then?

Not really. Loads of priests are paedos, and crosses make very handy dildos, except maybe for the splinters, but if you're going to masturbate with a wooden one that really is your lookout I suppose. Also some people might get off on ther splinters, so really what goes on in the privacy of their own homes is nothing to do with anyone else. As long as they don't go on about it. I don't want it in my face. Nanny state gawn maaaad.

Cabbar's probably lolling and rofflemayoing at your outrage, ladies. I for one am underwhelmed. I hadn't realised I'd stumbled into afternoon tea at the Dorchester.