File Hosting vs BitTorrent

**barbarosa2008** · 09-28-2008, 09:27 PM

I have never used a BitTorrent,
I always use ezeeshare.com which is a file hosting site, why should I use BT?

**Polarbear** · 09-28-2008, 10:40 PM

Originally Posted by barbarosa2008

I have never used a BitTorrent,
I always use ezeeshare.com which is a file hosting site, why should I use BT?

-free
-faster
-greater variety of files

**SenorBubbz** · 09-28-2008, 11:07 PM

Originally Posted by barbarosa2008

I have never used a BitTorrent,
I always use ezeeshare.com which is a file hosting site, why should I use BT?

If you want us to convince you to use BT, then how about no?

Keep on using your ezeeshare and come back when you realize how much it sucks.

**dunson** · 09-29-2008, 02:30 AM

Torrents suck, don't even bother.

**toti** · 09-29-2008, 03:23 AM

BitTorrent is the best

**jam0980tr** · 09-29-2008, 05:54 AM

Originally Posted by dunson

Torrents suck, don't even bother.

File Hosting & BitTorrent They both suck lmao

File Transfer Protocol f**king wins anyday lol

Thread: File Hosting vs BitTorrent