Jewish settlers leaving the Gaza strip?

[whypikonme]

'...ask why he sends US soldiers to their deaths to enforce UN resolutions..."

-doesn't parse well at all; I thought "peanut brain" sent them in lieu of a more forthright U.N.-could you clarify?

Bush refused to go back to the UN, claiming they already had permission from them to invade.

[JPaul]

Remember you are dealing with a chap who posted " ... as the Jews are considered a race, as well as a religion ...". Which can only really mean that the true meaning of words is how they are commonly perceived, as opposed to their dictionary definition.

If this made sense l might be able to comment on it, but, as usual, when you have nothing to say, you feel compelled to do so anyway.

So to use anti-semite in it's accepted sense should not be that difficult for him.

Unless I am misunderstanding his earlier point and there is some historical basis for "Jew" referring to a race rather than a religion. Which I doubt, as there appear to be Jews from most, if not all, races.

Again, nonsensical jabber, do you even know what you're talking about?

Let's face it, he is the anti-semite, as we all already know.

Ah, now we understand, another pathetic personal attack from Mr Squeaky Clean.

l would have thought l was a little old to be stalked, but there you go.

Again with the claims of me stalking you Billy, based on what, I quoted something you posted earlier in the same thread. A predictable tactic which you use when you can't think of a way to answer. It always gives you away, if there was still any doubt.

Tell me this, if Judaism is a race and a black American converts to Judaism, does she change her race.

You say "anti-semite" to j2 and it's OK, I say it to you and it's " ... another pathetic personal attack ...". How does that work, back to one rule for you one rule for others.

You're a pathetic trolling coward, who doesn't even have the courage to admit who he really is.

[whypikonme]

Again with the claims of me stalking you Billy,

Now l understand, it's this Billy character again, isn't it? You stalk me because you think l'm Billy. He must be really pretty, has he turned you down?

Tell me this, if Judaism is a race and a black American converts to Judaism, does she change her race.

The way you can make so many 'points' on a misrepresentation is a credit to you. l said this ... " ... as the Jews are considered a race, as well as a religion ..." and you turn it into jews are and race and NOT a religion, well done.

You say "anti-semite" to j2 and it's OK, I say it to you and it's " ... another pathetic personal attack ...". How does that work, back to one rule for you one rule for others.

Take it up with the local Stalkers Union, l trust you're a paid up member?

You're a pathetic trolling coward, who doesn't even have the courage to admit who he really is.

l like the other JP best, at least he's funny.

[j2k4]

'...ask why he sends US soldiers to their deaths to enforce UN resolutions..."

-doesn't parse well at all; I thought "peanut brain" sent them in lieu of a more forthright U.N.-could you clarify?

Bush refused to go back to the UN, claiming they already had permission from them to invade.

Your interpretation of events differs from mine, then, and I can't be arsed to square them, why...me.

You have your story, and I have mine.

Funny how you and your like continue with this "We should have given the resolutions time to work..." especially in light of what we now know about "Oil-for-Food", etc.

I find the level of naivete stunning, but then, I'm an American, right?

[whypikonme]

Your interpretation of events differs from mine, then, and I can't be arsed to square them, why...me.

Yes, of course, your story is that Iraq was full of WMDs, and Hussein was harbouring al Qaeda terrorists.

You have your story, and I have mine.

Funny how you and your like continue with this "We should have given the resolutions time to work..." especially in light of what we now know about "Oil-for-Food", etc.

As opposed to what we know about WMDs.

I find the level of naivete stunning, but then, I'm an American, right?

Really? l never would have guessed.

[JPaul]

Tell me this, if Judaism is a race and a black American converts to Judaism, does she change her race.

The way you can make so many 'points' on a misrepresentation is a credit to you. l said this ... " ... as the Jews are considered a race, as well as a religion ..." and you turn it into jews are and race and NOT a religion, well done.

You say "anti-semite" to j2 and it's OK, I say it to you and it's " ... another pathetic personal attack ...". How does that work, back to one rule for you one rule for others.

Take it up with the local Stalkers Union, l trust you're a paid up member?

So if Judaism is a race and a religion, when the black woman converts and changes her religion (obvious the first time round) does she also change her race.

I know you can't answer this and will simply deflect from it (or more likely ignore it) but I thought I'd try to see if you could make some sort of sense out of your ridiculous statement "... as the Jews are considered a race, as well as a religion ..." .

(I quoted it from you there, but it actually doesn't make any difference, as you are well aware.)

[j2k4]

Your interpretation of events differs from mine, then, and I can't be arsed to square them, why...me.

Yes, of course, your story is that Iraq was full of WMDs, and Hussein was harbouring al Qaeda terrorists.

Saddam had dealings with them and supported their "ideals"; whether this is qualifies as "harboring" is a matter of perception.

BTW-You apparently haven't kept up with the Joseph Wilson/Niger/yellow-cake story, have you?

Ah, well-it's not for me to relieve you of your ignorance.

You have your story, and I have mine.

Funny how you and your like continue with this "We should have given the resolutions time to work..." especially in light of what we now know about "Oil-for-Food", etc.

As opposed to what we know about WMDs.

You accord this belief to me?

You should know that I couldn't care less about WMD vis a vis Iraq; I'm all for spreading democracy in the mideast-Saddam was too damn convenient a target to ignore, and your beloved U.N.'s thumb was up it's ass, so there you go...

You apparently have no problem with Oil-for-Food?

O.K.-your bias is hanging out in the breeze, too.


I find the level of naivete stunning, but then, I'm an American, right?

Really? l never would have guessed.

It figures that you'd be the one member I could fool.

[Rat Faced]

Saddam had dealings with them and supported their "ideals"; whether this is qualifies as "harboring" is a matter of perception.

Their bases were in the Kurds area, ie: North East Iraq, where Hussain had no control. The people that supported them have now reverted to bombing the hell out of Turkey again. I think only Bush and Limburgh still go on about this now..

BTW-You apparently haven't kept up with the Joseph Wilson/Niger/yellow-cake story, have you?

Ah, well-it's not for me to relieve you of your ignorance.

This is the one whereby the Whitehouse broke the law re: CIA agents identities I believe, and can do that with impunity.. but hell to pay if anyone else even looks dirty, such as the UN..

You have your story, and I have mine.

Funny how you and your like continue with this "We should have given the resolutions time to work..." especially in light of what we now know about "Oil-for-Food", etc.

We also know about the Whitehouse lying through its teeth about a few things and causing 1000's of innocent deaths, plus filling their pockets at the same time.. whats up? OK for yanks to be corrupt but no-one else?

At least their is investigations and charges being brought against the UN figures.. when will this happen in the US?

And about the Resolutions being "Given time to work"... how? Sell him some more WMD so he could destroy them? How, exactly was he going to destroy what he didnt have, what the UN inspectors said they suspected he didnt have, and the US/UK blocked the technological equipment to prove he didnt have?

Seems that he was just put over a barrel and shafted to me...

You accord this belief to me?

You should know that I couldn't care less about WMD vis a vis Iraq; I'm all for spreading democracy in the mideast-Saddam was too damn convenient a target to ignore, and your beloved U.N.'s thumb was up it's ass, so there you go...


We know that.

Like your government you just wanted to kick some ass and ruin your countries reputation through most of the world as being about freedom, democracy and justice.

Hows that late Constitution coming on by the way? I here the shi'ites are killing each other now, so its not just the sunni that are revolting..

Nice way to create a civil war.. which is always the nastiest type of war. And, of course, while that goes on.. Oil Prices will remain high.. Good for the Bush family business huh? What is it now their companies flog it at... $68 a barrel?? Wow, they're really making a killing from all this arent they?

You apparently have no problem with Oil-for-Food?

Yes I do.

However i also have a problem with all the corruption, whereas yours appears to be only about the corruption regarding a few UN officials. It appears to be fine if it happens in Congress, The Senate or The Whitehouse..

O.K.-your bias is hanging out in the breeze, too.

And, as i am pissed about ALL the corruption, whereas yours is only "Oil For Food".. the bias is where?


I find the level of naivete stunning, but then, I'm an American, right?

I was often stunned by your supposed naivete, then i realised that you just didnt answer threads which criticised the Right, but you actually agreed with.

I am quite appalled by your naivete with regard to Iraq however, and always have been...

So far, everything i said 3 years ago has come to pass, or looks like coming to pass... I must see if i can find a job as an Oracle...

Nah... this one was just so bloody obvious, even then

[j2k4]

Saddam had dealings with them and supported their "ideals"; whether this is qualifies as "harboring" is a matter of perception.

Their bases were in the Kurds area, ie: North East Iraq, where Hussain had no control. The people that supported them have now reverted to bombing the hell out of Turkey again. I think only Bush and Limburgh still go on about this now..

BTW-You apparently haven't kept up with the Joseph Wilson/Niger/yellow-cake story, have you?

Ah, well-it's not for me to relieve you of your ignorance.

This is the one whereby the Whitehouse broke the law re: CIA agents identities I believe, and can do that with impunity.. but hell to pay if anyone else even looks dirty, such as the UN..

You have your story, and I have mine.

Funny how you and your like continue with this "We should have given the resolutions time to work..." especially in light of what we now know about "Oil-for-Food", etc.

We also know about the Whitehouse lying through its teeth about a few things and causing 1000's of innocent deaths, plus filling their pockets at the same time.. whats up? OK for yanks to be corrupt but no-one else?

At least their is investigations and charges being brought against the UN figures.. when will this happen in the US?

And about the Resolutions being "Given time to work"... how? Sell him some more WMD so he could destroy them? How, exactly was he going to destroy what he didnt have, what the UN inspectors said they suspected he didnt have, and the US/UK blocked the technological equipment to prove he didnt have?

Seems that he was just put over a barrel and shafted to me...

You accord this belief to me?

You should know that I couldn't care less about WMD vis a vis Iraq; I'm all for spreading democracy in the mideast-Saddam was too damn convenient a target to ignore, and your beloved U.N.'s thumb was up it's ass, so there you go...


We know that.

Like your government you just wanted to kick some ass and ruin your countries reputation through most of the world as being about freedom, democracy and justice.

Hows that late Constitution coming on by the way? I here the shi'ites are killing each other now, so its not just the sunni that are revolting..

Nice way to create a civil war.. which is always the nastiest type of war. And, of course, while that goes on.. Oil Prices will remain high.. Good for the Bush family business huh? What is it now their companies flog it at... $68 a barrel?? Wow, they're really making a killing from all this arent they?

You apparently have no problem with Oil-for-Food?

Yes I do.

However i also have a problem with all the corruption, whereas yours appears to be only about the corruption regarding a few UN officials. It appears to be fine if it happens in Congress, The Senate or The Whitehouse..

O.K.-your bias is hanging out in the breeze, too.

And, as i am pissed about ALL the corruption, whereas yours is only "Oil For Food".. the bias is where?


I find the level of naivete stunning, but then, I'm an American, right?

I was often stunned by your supposed naivete, then i realised that you just didnt answer threads which criticised the Right, but you actually agreed with.

I am quite appalled by your naivete with regard to Iraq however, and always have been...

So far, everything i said 3 years ago has come to pass, or looks like coming to pass... I must see if i can find a job as an Oracle...

Nah... this one was just so bloody obvious, even then

I see you haven't kept up either, Rat.

The Whitehouse/Karl Rove/Joe Wilson/Niger/Valerie Plame/Robert Novak issue turns out to be a non-issue; nobody in the Whitehouse lied.

Even our media has abandoned their attempts to do in Rove, Novak or anybody else over it, as they see they've been misled.

I believe you are the only one still banging on about it now.

[Rat Faced]

J2...

This is what i mean..

The Law was broken, but because of the embarasment it would cause to the hierarchy, it is a "non-issue"...while the Journalist stays in prison.

No questions are asked (nor answered) why Ashcroft refused to recuse himself, for months, from something he was personally involved in..

No questions asked (nor answered) why a personal friend of Bush is now in charge of the investigation, following Comeys leaving for a new job...

Your naivete is the thing that shows here..



You know, the President and all his men are Civil SERVANTS.. Their actions are supposed to be, above approach.

Not just honest, but above the appearance of impropriaty...


Its people's refusal to question, that has let him and his croneys literally get away with murder.