Discuss.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
you can go fast enough to poo your pants within the speed limit and corners rawk.
in terms of fun... bikes>cars
So they are more fun because they aren't as safe and they don't corner as well.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
To each their own I suppose.
Don't corner as well? that's not correct, a blade will handle better than a mondeo, a ferrari will handle better than a vmax , same as for safety, it's down to the person in control.
Reguardless of what happens, depends on what vehicle you're on, the condition of it and the driver/rider.
I hate that "Bikes are dangerous" crap, cars are dangerous, granted you have more protection in a car, but on the flip side I've never heard of anyone spending 6 hours being cut out of a bike.
Swings and roundabouts mate![]()
Jonno![]()
bikes are more dangerous and i reckon they probably don't corner as well, but it's more fun.
i'm guessing the fact that a car has more tyre area on the ground at all times makes it technically better in corners
cars are space hogs - if everybody dove bikes there would be alot less traffic strawberry jams.
if everybody learnt to fly (without falling) enviromental issues would also be improved
![]()
Cars corner better than bikes, for the simple reason they have about 8 times as much traction and a better balance.Originally Posted by Jon L. Obscene
A decent car will handle better in corners than a top whack bike, this is a fact.
Bikes have better straight line acceleration because of the power to weight ratio, however there are exceptions.
Last edited by JPaul; 08-18-2005 at 09:13 PM.
Not just technically, actually.Originally Posted by GepperRankins
They hold the road better and can corner faster.
depends how you define better, actually
cornering on a bike is more fun IMO so i would say bikes are better at cornering.
so technically by numbers cars are better, but bikes are better fun![]()
Bookmarks