yes, well, Bush doesn't oversee how states and cities spend their federal funds, although many times they come with their own little stipulations. You don't want him to, do you?Originally Posted by Busyman
Well Evey, you engulf the entire thing into Emergency Prepardness. I did not.
It IS Emergency Prepardness but I choose to separate natural disaster relief from anti-terrorism. They are different. The way I worded my post made that CaptainObvious.![]()
Bush puts forth the notion yet is shit at follow through. Mmk? Putting forth the money means shit if the proper oversight isn't in place to make sure it is spent properly.Originally Posted by Everose
Which is it? Is Bush a security minded cowboy as you seem to say a lot of people think, or does he not care about national security? Yesterday you claimed he didn't give a shit. Now he is way too security minded because he allocates money for terrorism emergencies.
So have patience with me here.... Bush allocates the spending to the states, etc., and elected officials in these states should be seeing that it is spent properly? Or Bush should allocate and follow every state, city, ward, parish and see that it is spent properly?
He's good at playing Bible card to the poor and religious right and the money card to the rich. Some of those are the same people of course.What is he good at? Apparently remaining President of the United States.You have to hand it to him....that isn't easy for any man these days.
If your poor and religious - "Hey I'm not good for your job situation but I don't like gays."
If your rich - "I'll put money in your pocket."
Yes, he is definitely a politician.
I never said we can't afford to because of Iraq.Originally Posted by Everose
Guess I don't understand your 'They can afford to now' statement, Busy. First you were running with the 'we can't afford to because of Iraq.' Now you are saying we all of a sudden can afford to.Wtf?!!!
I very well could have misunderstood your comments, Busy. If so, please accept my apology.
Sent rescuers in a day. I wish the US Coastal Guard and the National Guard could have been there within the hour, but twelve hours is what they say it took.Originally Posted by Everose
Please explain to me exactly what you think the federal government should have done here. Sent the National Guard and the US Coast Guard in before the levee broke? Who would have rescued them? As it was, the Coast Guard had to retrieve a lot of it's own people before it could rescue others. I am thankful someone had the sense not to send the National Guard in before they did. Then we would have had even longer delays, no?
NoOriginally Posted by Everose
A lot of effort has been put forth here to explain responsibilities of self, city, parish and state in this situation, also. I really feel the federal government met its responsibilities as quickly as possible. But the local effort failed miserably. Why did they not prepare for this, knowing a lot of their citizens didn't have the means to get out by themselves. And also knowing a lot of them would choose not to, even given that choice? I look around in my own city and I am aware who would need assistance out of here. For me to expect the federal government to know is absurd. Are you suggesting the Department of Defense should have had time to be in these areas, on the ground with buses, food and supplies before the levee broke? Just in case of?
The stadium was being built with taxpayer money and extra tax on area businesses. One councilwoman did step in and got part private financing in the 11th hour.Originally Posted by Everose
You are angry about some baseball stadium when the schools in your area need work; you should be and have a right to that anger. Was the stadium put up for a bond issue/public vote? Have the schools attempted bond issues to repair and rebuild? Has the public voted these bond issues down?
The problems of illegal immigrants are not ours besides the fact they shouldn't be here. Oh damn...I said that already.Originally Posted by Everose
First you say that our borders are going to shit and imply nothing is being done. Then you say it is not our problem. Which is it, Busyman?I disagree.
![]()
Oversight on how federal money is being spent. If there is oversight, it's shit oversight.Originally Posted by Everose
I am getting dizzy trying to follow you. No oversight on what? By whom?![]()
Bookmarks