Hurricane Katrina...

[manker]

manker is some kind of classy escort?

Why classy?

Altho' you're near the mark

[Rat Faced]

Wont you get fired for going into work naked?

You need to have a boss before you can get fired.

I thought you were married already?

[manker]

You need to have a boss before you can get fired.

I thought you were married already?

Ohhh, you were doing well.

No, I'm not married.

[Busyman]

Boy, I can't wait for a democrat President.

The Drawing Room will be a mighty quiet place...

You don't get it do you?

If a Democratic President did these same things, people across the sea would feel the same way.

Clinton's 8 years in office were much more, how should I say it....palatable by leaps and bounds. He was a dumbass for getting his dick sucked and lying about it but......many off us common folk, how should I say it......understood.

[Rat Faced]

He was also in the pocket of the American Car Makers, bombed the fuck out of Afganistan for no particular reason other than take attention off his dick...

He was a Hedonist that was as crooked as a 3 dollar Bill.

There were some achievements on his watch though, which you refuse to acknowledge.

The world does, as these achievements affected just about everyone, mostly in a positive manner.


Should he have been impeached? Yes, but not for what he was impeached for, getting his Dick sucked is his business, not the US publics. Between him and his wife.

Shame that you didnt impeach him for the stuff that mattered and were plain illegal. That would have opened the door onto the "perks" of your administrative system and stopped everyone else getting kickbacks though, so you didnt.

Clinton though, at least kissed you while he was shafting you...

[brotherdoobie]

He was also in the pocket of the American Car Makers, bombed the fuck out of Afganistan for no particular reason other than take attention off his dick...

He was a Hedonist that was as crooked as a 3 dollar Bill.

There were some achievements on his watch though, which you refuse to acknowledge.

The world does, as these achievements affected just about everyone, mostly in a positive manner.


Should he have been impeached? Yes, but not for what he was impeached for, getting his Dick sucked is his business, not the US publics. Between him and his wife.

Shame that you didnt impeach him for the stuff that mattered and were plain illegal. That would have opened the door onto the "perks" of your administrative system and stopped everyone else getting kickbacks though, so you didnt.

Clinton though, at least kissed you while he was shafting you...

Paul, Why your obsession with American Politics? I follow the issues
somewhat, enough to stay informed. I also like to stay abreast world
issues. Yet, I know very little of British politics.

I'm just currious. It's not a critique.

You honestly don't believe that perks and kickbacks can be stopped,in any
administration...Do you?

The greasing of wheels is timeless.

Peace bd

[j2k4]

The report also stated quite clearly that despite any corruption, the blame for which was spread equally amongst nations (and remember that most of the oil did actually end up in the US, and Bush is implicated in the scandal now), was a success.

If you wish to commend the reports findings, then lets commend all of them please.. say after me now... "Oil for Food was a success", bet you'd hate that

If you wish to commend the reports findings, then lets commend all of them please.. say after me now... "Oil for Food was a success", bet you'd hate that

Come on J2, im waiting here....

For what?

Your obsession with Bush precludes noting that if Bush presided while the Oil-for-Food fiasco was taking place, he would have been stepping into Clinton's shoes as re: stewardship of that situation, because that is when it started...you seem, however, to believe Clinton's only negative was an Oval Office hummer, about which none of the hoi polloi have entree to opine.

In all other regards, Clinton seems to have been your kind of guy, as you've not mentioned this very salient fact, which, by the way, amounts to the same petard as the Halliburton one, which was heartily initiated by Clinton.

As to whether or not the Iraqis got fed, watered and medicated by virtue of Oil-for-Food, how well they made out was a relative thing, given that we now know how well Saddam (and a few well-chosen U.N. flunkies and figureheads) made out, too, the fact of which doesn't seem to bother you either, so eager are you to hang the whole thing on Bush, or at least mitigate the blame-worthiness of others by including him in the bargain.

I would think a fair-minded person should be outraged that Saddam lined his pockets to tha Iraqis' detriment, by virtue of a program meant to regulate his financial viability and care for his people, administered by the U.N.-not the U.S.

I've heard more outrage from this board, in this single thread, about poorly-chosen but off-the-cuff remarks made by the President's mother than I have about Oil-for-Food in the entire history of that issue...

[GepperRankins]

If you wish to commend the reports findings, then lets commend all of them please.. say after me now... "Oil for Food was a success", bet you'd hate that

Come on J2, im waiting here....

For what?

Your obsession with Bush precludes noting that if Bush presided while the Oil-for-Food fiasco was taking place, he would have been stepping into Clinton's shoes as re: stewardship of that situation, because that is when it started...you seem, however, to believe Clinton's only negative was an Oval Office hummer, about which none of the hoi polloi have entree to opine.

In all other regards, Clinton seems to have been your kind of guy, as you've not mentioned this very salient fact, which, by the way, amounts to the same petard as the Halliburton one, which was heartily initiated by Clinton.

As to whether or not the Iraqis got fed, watered and medicated by virtue of Oil-for-Food, how well they made out was a relative thing, given that we now know how well Saddam (and a few well-chosen U.N. flunkies and figureheads) made out, too, the fact of which doesn't seem to bother you either, so eager are you to hang the whole thing on Bush, or at least mitigate the blame-worthiness of others by including him in the bargain.

I would think a fair-minded person should be outraged that Saddam lined his pockets to tha Iraqis' detriment, by virtue of a program meant to regulate his financial viability and care for his people, administered by the U.N.-not the U.S.

I've heard more outrage from this board, in this single thread, about poorly-chosen but off-the-cuff remarks made by the President's mother than I have about Oil-for-Food in the entire history of that issue...

i made a comment, apparently educating oneself is bad and prejudice is good now though

[Santa]

when did a hurricane become political?
where can i vote for her?

[GepperRankins]

when did a hurricane become political?
where can i vote for her?

don't bother. she blows