Soccer Questions.

[Cheese]

I think they're getting teh shaft as they are in the last year of their contract with UPN. RAW's move to USA Networks next month could see a resurgence of interest in wrestling and a new home for Smackdown.

That's funny 'cause (I kid you not) I didn't actually know they were going to basic cable.

Why would it moving to USA give it a resurgence? WWF or Ewhateverthefuck was on Spike TV (used to come on before CSI repeats) and never recalled much fanfare.

WWE (then WWF) was at the height of its popularity when it was on USA was going to be my main reasoning. But perhaps I need to do some research into US TV networks before I comment further.

I did say "could" though...

[Busyman]

That's funny 'cause (I kid you not) I didn't actually know they were going to basic cable.

Why would it moving to USA give it a resurgence? WWF or Ewhateverthefuck was on Spike TV (used to come on before CSI repeats) and never recalled much fanfare.

WWE (then WWF) was at the height of its popularity when it was on USA was going to be my main reasoning. But perhaps I need to do some research into US TV networks before I comment further.

I did say "could" though...

Channels don't make a program unless they have a hand in changing the program's format for the better or it gives said program more visibilty.

Going from network TV to basic cable is less visibility.

[brotherdoobie]

WWE (then WWF) was at the height of its popularity when it was on USA was going to be my main reasoning. But perhaps I need to do some research into US TV networks before I comment further.

I did say "could" though...

Channels don't make a program unless they have a hand in changing the program's format for the better or it gives said program more visibilty.

Going from network TV to basic cable is less visibility.

Tivo (PVR) is changing the way we watch tv. Basic cable is not the
graveyard of television, it once was. Wrestling has been doing great
on cable for years.

Peace bd

[Cheese]

WWE (then WWF) was at the height of its popularity when it was on USA was going to be my main reasoning. But perhaps I need to do some research into US TV networks before I comment further.

I did say "could" though...

Channels don't make a program unless they have a hand in changing the program's format for the better or it gives said program more visibilty.

Going from network TV to basic cable is less visibility.

Well, the upcoming move will be interesting (to me at least). Spike TV are airing UFC head-to-head with Raw. Genuine competition (they'll both be after a similar audience) will hopefully lead to a better product and thus, possibly, more interest.

As to the first point I realise that the channel has little or no hand in making the show(s), my point was just that WWE obviously have had a successful relationship with USA Network in the past. Something they haven't enjoyed with Spike TV.

[brotherdoobie]

Channels don't make a program unless they have a hand in changing the program's format for the better or it gives said program more visibilty.

Going from network TV to basic cable is less visibility.

Well, the upcoming move will be interesting (to me at least). Spike TV are airing UFC head-to-head with Raw. Genuine competition (they'll both be after a similar audience) will hopefully lead to a better product and thus, possibly, more interest.

As to the first point I realise that the channel has little or no hand in making the show(s), my point was just that WWE obviously have had a successful relationship with USA Network in the past. Something they haven't enjoyed with Spike TV.

I think it's a wise move. Wrestling is at it's best, when there are competing
leagues, going head to head.

Peace bd

[Busyman]

Channels don't make a program unless they have a hand in changing the program's format for the better or it gives said program more visibilty.

Going from network TV to basic cable is less visibility.

Tivo (PVR) is changing the way we watch tv. Basic cable is not the
graveyard of television, it once was. Wrestling has been doing great
on cable for years.

Peace bd

My statement still stands. Cable is less visibility.

[Busyman]

Channels don't make a program unless they have a hand in changing the program's format for the better or it gives said program more visibilty.

Going from network TV to basic cable is less visibility.

Well, the upcoming move will be interesting (to me at least). Spike TV are airing UFC head-to-head with Raw. Genuine competition (they'll both be after a similar audience) will hopefully lead to a better product and thus, possibly, more interest.

As to the first point I realise that the channel has little or no hand in making the show(s), my point was just that WWE obviously have had a successful relationship with USA Network in the past. Something they haven't enjoyed with Spike TV.

I rather watch UFC. That is extremely real.

Now THAT'S a cable show.

[JPaul]

Isn't "extremely real" qualifying a superlative.

Can one have degrees of real.

[Busyman]

Isn't "extremely real" qualifying a superlative.

Can one have degrees of real.

Yes.
Besides that, I couldn't give a shit* about superlaxatives.

UFC is really, really, really, extremely, and really real....and that's realer and betterer than WWE..................imho.




* Whether this is the correct version or whether I should or shouldn't give 2 or even 3 shits, I could or couldn't give a shit. If one struggles with this wording then simply get some pussy to get your mind off grammar. However, If you think that there is something, possibly, in the world that you do give 9 shits about, feel free to use whatever the fuck comes to mind since, if you could or couldn't give a shit, it doesn't fucking matter....now does it? ANSWER ME MOTHERFUCKER!!!. Thanks, and fuck yo mama.

[JPaul]

Isn't "extremely real" qualifying a superlative.

Can one have degrees of real.

Yes.
Besides that, I couldn't give a shit* about superlaxatives.

UFC is really, really, really, extremely, and really real....and that's realer and betterer than WWE..................imho.




* Whether this is the correct version or whether I should or shouldn't give 2 or even 3 shits, I could or couldn't give a shit. If one struggles with this wording then simply get some pussy to get your mind off grammar. However, If you think that there is something, possibly, in the world that you do give 9 shits about, feel free to use whatever the fuck comes to mind since, if you could or couldn't give a shit, it doesn't fucking matter....now does it? ANSWER ME MOTHERFUCKER!!!. Thanks, and fuck yo mama.

It's really rather surprising, the lengths to which you will go, in commenting on a subject, with regard to which, you "couldn't give a shit".