Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Single-play DVDs? It's a hoax

  1. #1
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    New Zealand
    Age
    48
    Posts
    1,438
    Sorry about my previous post just found out that single play dvds were a hoax...

    On the Internet, a hoax can spread just as fast as a genuine news story. That’s the lesson from the bogus story published in an obscure UK business magazine yesterday that claimed Microsoft is about to unleash a new single-play DVD format.

    Paul Thurrott reprinted the story without giving credit to the original source. Bink.nu picked up the story from Paul and reprinted it verbatim.

    Techdirt commented on the original story, with attribution but without any fact-checking. So did John Walkenbach.

    The funny part? There’s no truth to the story. None whatsoever. In fact, the original story sparked a flurry of e-mails around Microsoft as people in different groups tried to figure out where on earth this story came from. After the head-scratching stopped, a spokesmen told me, they concluded that the story was not true. “It appears to be confusing an existing feature within Windows Media DRM that allows for single-play of promotional digital material. This has been an option for content owners to use for some time for the Windows Media format - it does not apply to MPEG2 content found on DVDs.”

    Downloaded content in the Windows Media format can be DRM-protected, and if the content owner wants to limit it to a specific number of plays, or to set an expiration date for the content, that’s an option, just as it is with subscription-based music services. But it’s only one of many options, and it has nothing to do with DVDs.

    So, case closed. The single-play DVD format can go back to the 1990s, where it rightfully belongs.

    Source: http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1061

  2. News (Archive)   -   #2
    twisterX's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    CoNNecticut
    Posts
    3,062
    Wasnt there already some self destruct dvd's. Like in 24 hours they would fog up or something causing them to be unreadable

  3. News (Archive)   -   #3
    Poster
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Age
    34
    Posts
    157
    they would go opaque so the laser couldnt read the disc havent heard anything about those in a long time

  4. News (Archive)   -   #4
    peat moss's Avatar Software Farmer BT Rep: +15BT Rep +15BT Rep +15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Delta B.C. Canada
    Posts
    10,547
    Thanks neotheone ,for taking the time to post the retraction ?

  5. News (Archive)   -   #5
    twisterX's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    CoNNecticut
    Posts
    3,062
    Quote Originally Posted by McStabhappy
    they would go opaque so the laser couldnt read the disc havent heard anything about those in a long time
    but couldnt you like put it in your computer and rip it before it did? Those things cost like 3 bucks.

  6. News (Archive)   -   #6
    kanaywali
    Guest
    doubt it would catch on though,,,

  7. News (Archive)   -   #7
    Barbarossa's Avatar mostly harmless
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Over here!
    Posts
    15,180
    Quote Originally Posted by kanaywali
    doubt it would catch on though,,,
    Maybe that was the idea behind the hoax... an indirect way to gauge public opinion...

    I think the results should be fairly unanimous!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •