there is no god
On the contrary, I have stated many times before if Clinton broke the law he is not above it.Originally Posted by j2k4
Oh, so if the one makes it to the end of one's term before being properly sorted, one skates?
A novel view.
Anything to preserve that legacy, huh?
But I thought you would approve of sending the IRS after people...after all if they did no wrong.......
To this I will add that I dislike the presidential pardons
Last edited by vidcc; 01-21-2006 at 03:17 AM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
en(un)lightened
The redactions are fruit of the labors of scads of lawyers disposed to protect Clinton.If it held up, or was thought to be solid enough to hold up - I presume it would have been in the redacted version.
That would be the general premis behind any redaction, yes?
Maybe the redacters are corrupt and decided to protect Clinton.
By my way of thinking, it has to be one or the other.
I kinda think it's probably the former - but then my understanding of how these things work in America is limited.
No security stuff involved.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
en(un)lightened
Awfully disingenuous of you, vid.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
effendi
So, it's the former reason. They wouldn't hold up.The redactions are fruit of the labors of scads of lawyers disposed to protect Clinton.
No security stuff involved.
Thought so
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
en(un)lightened
You don't know enough to rod on the subject, so I'm left with naive or smartass as choices.So, it's the former reason. They wouldn't hold up.
Thought so
Both, more likely.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
there is no god
Well you seem unconcerned about privacy re. wiretapping without warrants, only the guilty have something to worry about. So yes it may be a calculating statement but I am giving you the credit of not having double standardsAwfully disingenuous of you, vid.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
effendi
I already said that I don't know how these things work in America. By all means, look upon that as a lack of sophistication if you like. However, I put forward what I logically thought to be the case.You don't know enough to rod on the subject, so I'm left with naive or smartass as choices.So, it's the former reason. They wouldn't hold up.
Thought so
Both, more likely.
You appeared to confirm what I thought.
Are you intimating that this is not the case? If so, please expound upon how a lawyer, no matter by whom he was dispatched, can be corrupt and illegally cover-up bonafide, 100% confirmed factiods in a high profile report such as this.
The way I see it, if something happened and was uncovered by the report compilers - and evidence supported the claim - the lawyers would not be able to cover it up. Unless corruption is in evidence.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
en(un)lightened
Oh, thank you, thank you.Well you seem unconcerned about privacy re. wiretapping without warrants, only the guilty have something to worry about. So yes it may be a calculating statement but I am giving you the credit of not having double standards
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
en(un)lightened
You also suffer a knowledge deficit as re: the "art" of American lawyering.
I haven't the time to explain that.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
effendi
It probably works in much the same way as it does over here.You also suffer a knowledge deficit as re: the "art" of American lawyering.
I haven't the time to explain that.
The people who complied the Barret Report didn't have enough evidence to release all of their findings. They wouldn't have held up under the scrutiny of people employed to find fault within them.
Some of their assertions must have been watertight - hence the redacted report getting published. It appears that a lot of their other assertions were not watertight, since they weren't published along with the watertight stuff.
Hence their relagation to fodder for Conservative conjecture in the unpopular press.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks