en(un)lightened
Hmmm.Originally Posted by vidcc
I hear now that Tom Delay has claimed a seat on the subcommittee overseeing the Justice Department, which is currently investigating Jack Abramoff and his dealings with lawmakers.
No reason to suspect anything there
That's like Jamie Gorelick sitting on the 9/11 committee.
No conflict there, and curiously, no outrage, either.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Explain please. Who's Jamie Gorelick?Hmmm.I hear now that Tom Delay has claimed a seat on the subcommittee overseeing the Justice Department, which is currently investigating Jack Abramoff and his dealings with lawmakers.
No reason to suspect anything there
That's like Jamie Gorelick sitting on the 9/11 committee.
No conflict there, and curiously, no outrage, either.
Was he related to one of the hijackers?
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
en(un)lightened
SHE is an ex-Clintonista who is largely responsible for the lack of intelligence-sharing which apparently kept us from doping out the plot for 9/11.Explain please. Who's Jamie Gorelick?
Hmmm.
That's like Jamie Gorelick sitting on the 9/11 committee.
No conflict there, and curiously, no outrage, either.
Was he related to one of the hijackers?
She delineates and erects the barriers between the CIA and FBI, then sits on the committee that bitches about it.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Yeah that is fucking ass backwards.SHE is an ex-Clintonista who is largely responsible for the lack of intelligence-sharing which apparently kept us from doping out the plot for 9/11.
She delineates and erects the barriers between the CIA and FBI, then sits on the committee that bitches about it.
Do have any examples of what she's done?
What barriers did she erect and what DID we have on the 9/11 hijackers?
Why the fuck she is even on the committee if she is even possibly one of the fuck ups?
You would think the committee be comprised of people that aren't trying to cover their ass.
edit: Yeah she's trying to cover her own ass and should DEFINITELY not be on the committee.
I did see her same policies were ratified by Ashcroft in Aug of '01 but that's besides the point.
Alot of this stuff is hindsight but wtf shit logic is having her as a commissioner?
Who picked these people? Shouldn't step down now this stuff about her has come to light?
I read she doesn't want to testify in public.
Last edited by Busyman; 02-10-2006 at 06:33 AM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
en(un)lightened
Yeah that is fucking ass backwards.
Do have any examples of what she's done?
What barriers did she erect and what DID we have on the 9/11 hijackers?
Why the fuck she is even on the committee if she is even possibly one of the fuck ups?
You would think the committee be comprised of people that aren't trying to cover their ass.
edit: Yeah she's trying to cover her own ass and should DEFINITELY not be on the committee.
I did see her same policies were ratified by Ashcroft in Aug of '01 but that's besides the point.
Alot of this stuff is hindsight but wtf shit logic is having her as a commissioner?
Who picked these people? Shouldn't step down now this stuff about her has come to light?
I read she doesn't want to testify in public.
You see, this is one of the examples of "digging up the past as an excuse for Bush's activities" and "they did it, too" that are are usually ridiculed by yourself and vid; it's "news" to you, because the media hasn't hung somebody out to dry over it.
I mentioned it several times, but no one here was the least impressed.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
I don't watch news much. I might catch something in passing but that's about it. When vid posts some news it's usually the first I hear of it.Yeah that is fucking ass backwards.
Do have any examples of what she's done?
What barriers did she erect and what DID we have on the 9/11 hijackers?
Why the fuck she is even on the committee if she is even possibly one of the fuck ups?
You would think the committee be comprised of people that aren't trying to cover their ass.
edit: Yeah she's trying to cover her own ass and should DEFINITELY not be on the committee.
I did see her same policies were ratified by Ashcroft in Aug of '01 but that's besides the point.
Alot of this stuff is hindsight but wtf shit logic is having her as a commissioner?
Who picked these people? Shouldn't step down now this stuff about her has come to light?
I read she doesn't want to testify in public.
You see, this is one of the examples of "digging up the past as an excuse for Bush's activities" and "they did it, too" that are are usually ridiculed by yourself and vid; it's "news" to you, because the media hasn't hung somebody out to dry over it.
I mentioned it several times, but no one here was the least impressed.
Sorry to say it but he also posts news better than you. It's the way you talk ya see. I don't really care for what you think of as eloquent prose when trying to convey information. I'm a direct kinda guy and am normally doing 3 things at once. I was around folks that sounded like you in high school and college and they would sound "impressive" but they also put my instructors to sleep while I did not. I hope you don't talk this way irl. Even this time I had to ask who Jamie Gorelick was when in contrast, vid would just be out with it.
You also keep grouping me with vid ON EVERY OCCASION. I don't bring up "they did it too" as often as you're making. Is this simply 'cause I mentioned Ashcroft signed off on the same stuff Jamie Gorelick did and the person before her did the same (and so on...)?
I've seen more bullshit and spin from you than vid. You'll excuse me if the boy that cried wolf was thought to be crying wolf yet again.
Last edited by Busyman; 02-10-2006 at 02:07 PM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
there is no god
I've already addressed J2s responses.
I await your next "but, but the democrats........." retort with great anticipation
Stated many times before it is no defense saying "but someone else did it as well".But I enjoy them anyway.
BTW I read right wing blogs and know all about ms. Gorelick
Last edited by vidcc; 02-10-2006 at 03:12 PM.
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
en(un)lightened
I don't beg a response from you, B.When vid posts some news it's usually the first I hear of it.
Sorry to say it but he also posts news better than you. It's the way you talk ya see. I don't really care for what you think of as eloquent prose when trying to convey information. I'm a direct kinda guy and am normally doing 3 things at once. I was around folks that sounded like you in high school and college and they would sound "impressive" but they also put my instructors to sleep while I did not. I hope you don't talk this way irl. Even this time I had to ask who Jamie Gorelick was when in contrast, vid would just be out with it.
You also keep grouping me with vid ON EVERY OCCASION. I don't bring up "they did it too" as often as you're making. Is this simply 'cause I mentioned Ashcroft signed off on the same stuff Jamie Gorelick did and the person before her did the same (and so on...)?
I've seen more bullshit and spin from you than vid. You'll excuse me if the boy that cried wolf was thought to be crying wolf yet again.
If you don't like my posting, then, well....just STFU about it, OK?
Sorry to steal your phrase, but it seems appropriate.
Put me on "ignore".
Vid is known for spin-free posting and news?
Great...I have no problem with that.
If you feel I lump you in with him too often, it's because that's where you end up most often.
If it makes you feel better, though, I'll stop.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Make me STFU.I don't beg a response from you, B.When vid posts some news it's usually the first I hear of it.
Sorry to say it but he also posts news better than you. It's the way you talk ya see. I don't really care for what you think of as eloquent prose when trying to convey information. I'm a direct kinda guy and am normally doing 3 things at once. I was around folks that sounded like you in high school and college and they would sound "impressive" but they also put my instructors to sleep while I did not. I hope you don't talk this way irl. Even this time I had to ask who Jamie Gorelick was when in contrast, vid would just be out with it.
You also keep grouping me with vid ON EVERY OCCASION. I don't bring up "they did it too" as often as you're making. Is this simply 'cause I mentioned Ashcroft signed off on the same stuff Jamie Gorelick did and the person before her did the same (and so on...)?
I've seen more bullshit and spin from you than vid. You'll excuse me if the boy that cried wolf was thought to be crying wolf yet again.
If you don't like my posting, then, well....just STFU about it, OK?
Sorry to steal your phrase, but it seems appropriate.
Put me on "ignore".
Vid is known for spin-free posting and news?
Great...I have no problem with that.
If you feel I lump you in with him too often, it's because that's where you end up most often.
If it makes you feel better, though, I'll stop.
If I don't like your posting, I'll say it sucks donkey ass, say it is shit Shakespeare with a thesaurus, say it is transparent "hold the Repub line", and say it is from a little boy that couldn't quite cut it who's grown into a teenager that still can't. You are the one whining about "your mention missing attention."
If I lump you in with piss, it's because shit usually ends with up piss.
Oh and Ashcroft signed off on the same shit Jamie Gorelick did....right in Aug. '01. Did I say that before?
Besides that, I thought this thread that you made was about conservatives.Don't get pissed when those in "The Party Of God" turn out to be lawbreaking, scandal-ridden, slimey, weaseling men that seem to play a great role in fucking up the country (while you clap and wave a flag).....and are posted in the appropriate thread.
Last edited by Busyman; 02-10-2006 at 09:32 PM.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
en(un)lightened
So peaceful and tolerant (heavy on the 'rant).Make me STFU.
If I don't like your posting, I'll say it sucks donkey ass, say it is shit Shakespeare with a thesaurus, say it is transparent "hold the Repub line", and say it is from a little boy that couldn't quite cut it who's grown into a teenager that still can't. You are the one whining about "your mention missing attention."
If I lump you in with piss, it's because shit usually ends with up piss.
Oh and Ashcroft signed off on the same shit Jamie Gorelick did....right in Aug. '01. Did I say that before?
Besides that, I thought this thread that you made was about conservatives.
So liberal.
To be blunt, then:
I don't give a fuck what you think of my posting, Busyman, and if you take exception, please so state.
I wouldn't think of even trying to shut you up, 'cuz I'm for free speech, see?
I just thought you might exercise your right to choose not to respond; it seems, though, that you can't resist.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
" retort with great anticipation 
Don't get pissed when those in "The Party Of God" turn out to be lawbreaking, scandal-ridden, slimey, weaseling men that seem to play a great role in fucking up the country (while you clap and wave a flag).....and are posted in the appropriate thread. 
Bookmarks