I'm wondering if your paranoyer is setting in again. I wonder what it is in your defense mechanism that makes you conclude such things.Originally Posted by j2k4
However as you missed it before (or just ignored it). By his own admission he did tell the press about plame. so he did do it.
Where you are getting defensive is because this little fact having been pointed out automatically makes you assume that I am convicting him of a crime. You are correct that Fitzgerald could find no basis (or was able to prove) for charging him with outing Plame, he has to prove it did it knowingly. I already said it is entirely possible that libby didn't know her status, so he may not have comitted a crime when he did it but that doesn't change the fact that he did do it........... there is a difference.
I state this with no poiltical agenda, simply the facts.
Oh how the insanely frothing mind worksOriginally Posted by j2k4
![]()
Bookmarks