Homos!

[Blythorama]

Man-on-man action is hot, precisely because it's more taboo than girl-on-girl. Us lasses rarely get to see you lot getting it on.

Why is this, seriously? Why is it a socially acceptable turn-on for both sexes to watch lass-on-lass but not man-on-man? Is it a threat to male sexuality to watch it? If so, why is it not a threat to ours to watch lesbo-action? Or are all women percieved as "being a little bit gay really"?

Just curious really.

It's quite easy....female are halfway gay already.

You complement on each others butt, help each other get dressed and hug each other all close like.

Further from that, it is socially acceptable 'cause women getting it on just look like sexy women. Men look like bitches.

I used to date a gay female and she was just as feminine as a straight woman. Sadly I couldn't get a threesome.

She also told me that gay women, even the butchiest ones, sometimes want dick.

How the fuck did you date a gay woman? Are you a lass?

Or do you mean she was bi?

[manker]

I really don't know about socially acceptable. I'm only talking from my perspective and what I'd like and what I wouldn't like.

I definitely don't like the thought of having anything up my arse and don't want to watch another bloke getting anything up his. Conversely, most ladies love getting munched on so don't mind seeing a lesbian sixty-nine.

Maybe that's it

But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

There was no logic in that post and nor did I allude to there being some.

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't

[Proper Bo]

The reason I don't is cause I'm not attracted to men, quite simple really.

[Blythorama]

But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

There was no logic in that post and nor did I allude to there being some.

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't

I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.

[enoughfakefiles]

[QUOTE=manker]

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't

Not even gay women.

[manker]

But by your logic, you wouldn't mind seeing a bloke giving another a blowjob for you enjoy them yourself?

Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.

Well, I don't get anything out of watching a bloke get a BJ off a girl either. Some guys do ... I don't know how to explain that either and would venture to guess that it cannot be encapsulated by anyone.

Since what stimulates us varies from person to person.

If you're insinuating that getting taken is thought of by heterosexual men as a weakness and therefore not erotic, then wouldn't the converse - seeing a woman get bukkaked - be the ultimate turn on, since it embodies dominance.

Because it isn't

[Proper Bo]

[quote=enoughfakefiles]

Not even gay women.

manker said that, not me

[manker]

There was no logic in that post and nor did I allude to there being some.

I've no idea why I don't want to watch gay porn, I just don't

I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.

Indeed

But that was obvious from a bloke's point of view - you were initially enquiring as to why women seemed more receptive to lesbian porn than men seeing two blokes getting sweaty.

I still have no idea of the answer

[Blythorama]

Exactly. From your comments it has something to do with penetration I feel. Heterosexual men don't get penetrated or "taken" and percieve the act of being "taken" to be an act of weakness maybe? I dunno. Just seems like double standards.

Well, I don't get anything out of watching a bloke get a BJ off a girl either. Some guys do ... I don't know how to explain that either and would venture to guess that it cannot be encapsulated by anyone.

Since what stimulates us is varies from person to person.

If you're insinuating that getting taken is thought of by heterosexual men as a weakness and therefore not erotic, then wouldn't the converse - seeing a woman get bukkaked - be the ultimate turn on, since it embodies dominance.

Because it isn't

No, I was merely speculating. I don't find anal sex remotely appealing. I have met some men however, that do find it the ultimate turn on when a woman is involved, precisely because of the dominance issue.

Whatever floats your boat I suppose.

[Blythorama]

I was only asking because I was curious about why girl-on-girl was so interesting and man-action wasn't.

I suppose the long and short of it is that you get to see two/four of everything.

Indeed

But that was obvious from a bloke's point of view - you were initially enquiring as to why women seemed more receptive to lesbian porn than men seeing two blokes getting sweaty.

I still have no idea of the answer

Maybe its because its more socially acceptable? If I suggested to someone I was sleeping with that we get a male-on-male porn flick, he'd most likely respond in the same way as you chaps!