Homos!

[manker]

maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her

rly, I did glag, irl, like.

[manker]

So nurture > nature in this case?

I tend to agree but wouldn't go so far as to use it as a general rule - a la Busyman

Well, not really nurture. More like social acceptance of different forms of erotica. Male fantasies are catered for with a massive porn industry directed at them. It is only recently porn specially designed for women has been available.

If it's not nature, by definition it must be nurture. That really is a black and white scenario.

Btw, did you notice how even tho' Busy is signed in anonymous, I pre-empted his posts with a succinct encapsulation

[enoughfakefiles]

I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

maybe his flabby bitch-tits confused her

[Busyman]

She had been only with women for 15 years. She considered men disgusting and disease carriers. I think long ago she considered women to be safer.

I still don't get it. Are you saying she "recovered" from her gayness to be with you?

Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.

She did say that she can't believe she used to eat pussy. I thought that was bullshit.

She did give shitty bj's...at first but got much much better.

Besides that though, she was a damn good woman. I wish it had worked out between me and her. She wanted to have a kid with me badly but I had to be married first.

[manker]

Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.

But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread

[Busyman]

Hell no. She still was attracted to women. No one can turn off that attraction.

But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread

Your lying. Post a link.

You can decide who you have sex with but not who is attractive.

[manker]

But you can turn it on, right?

So let me get this straight, people can decide to be gay but can't decide not to be gay.

At least so you said in a different thread

Your lying. Post a link.

You can decide who you have sex with but not who is attractive.

I have a photographic memory

[Blythorama]

Well, not really nurture. More like social acceptance of different forms of erotica. Male fantasies are catered for with a massive porn industry directed at them. It is only recently porn specially designed for women has been available.

If it's not nature, by definition it must be nurture. That really is a black and white scenario.

Btw, did you notice how even tho' Busy is signed in anonymous, I pre-empted his posts

Nature = Inherent in ourselves.
Nurture = Response to environmental stimuli.

I really don't know how our sexual responses are formed, whether they are learned or inherent. I'd like to say its a bit of both, but I really don't know. It's an interesting subject, how our preferences are formed and why we find something erotic or not. I do find the thought of two straight men together erotic, but I think it is more to do with the taboo, than anything else. But then again, I find the thought of another woman erotic too, but not because of the taboo.

I shall have to do some more research.

[Busyman]

Your lying. Post a link.

You can decide who you have sex with but not who is attractive.

I have a photographic memory

Nah. You've done stuff like that before.

It's probably more a problem with your reading comprehension than you being deceptive.

I apologize for my previous remarks.

[manker]

If it's not nature, by definition it must be nurture. That really is a black and white scenario.

Btw, did you notice how even tho' Busy is signed in anonymous, I pre-empted his posts

Nature = Inherent in ourselves.
Nurture = Response to environmental stimuli.

I really don't know how our sexual responses are formed, whether they are learned or inherent. I'd like to say its a bit of both, but I really don't know. It's an interesting subject, how our preferences are formed and why we find something erotic or not. I do find the thought of two straight men together erotic, but I think it is more to do with the taboo, than anything else. But then again, I find the thought of another woman erotic too, but not because of the taboo.

I shall have to do some more research.

Yes, a mix of both things which are, in themselves, mutually exclusive - and a mix which is different in everyone. That is exactly what I'm saying.

The taboo thing (two straight guys) is nurture and the not taboo thing (another woman) is nature ... however, because you, presumably, like the look of a knob then the former is partly to do with nature and because there is an inherent taboo involved with homosexual behaviour then the latter could be a little to do with nurture.

It's all very confusing and impossible to state something which will be correct for everyone.