-
Died in battle
-
-
04-18-2003, 12:08 PM
Software & Hardware -
#2
Poster
My system is, AMD Athlon XP 3000+, 1gig DDR Ram, ATI Radeon 9700 and i run the game at HIGHEST setting on everything, and @1024x768 32-bit Color and doesnt phaze the performace at all....Not only is it an awesome multi-tasker, it lets u play UT2k3 to the fullest with NO glicthy shit.
-
-
04-18-2003, 04:29 PM
Software & Hardware -
#3
Poster
ut2003 isn't really all that intensive. i've got an athlon 2700, 512 meg corsair ram and a geforce3 ti200 and i always get frame rates above 50fps
i'm gonna get a new video card soon, but you don't really need that high spec to run ut2003 well
edit: 50fps on 800*600*32
around 40fps 1024*768*32
-
-
04-18-2003, 07:50 PM
Software & Hardware -
#4
Poster
thas very true, ppl make it out where u need the best PC on earth to play when infact some of the basic 1giggers out right now can handle it well, but if want a good smooth game ya neeeda high-end system IMO
-
-
04-18-2003, 07:54 PM
Software & Hardware -
#5
=]
my 800mhz p3 can handle all the games i play so far...
but i dunt really like first shooters like >>ut2003... i have the real thing tho since someone gave me it... i stick w/ blizzard games and rpg... more space less intense graphics...
-
-
04-20-2003, 01:41 PM
Software & Hardware -
#6
Poster
Originally posted by Soul814@18 April 2003 - 20:54
my 800mhz p3 can handle all the games i play so far...
but i dunt really like first shooters like >>ut2003... i have the real thing tho since someone gave me it... i stick w/ blizzard games and rpg... more space less intense graphics...
all the games a play so far.... well the games that need better computers are first shooters
-
-
04-20-2003, 02:37 PM
Software & Hardware -
#7
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks