The Xbox 360 Is Quite Noice.

[erRor67]

PS3 is going to own XBox360 hands down... Microsoft doesnt have a chance.

[Guyver]

PS3 is going to own XBox360 hands down... Microsoft doesnt have a chance.

agreee, im a playstation fanboy lol

[Busyman]

PS3 is going to own XBox360 hands down... Microsoft doesnt have a chance.

agreee, im a playstation fanboy lol

I agree and I'm a logical fella.

[maebach]

I use to like Nintendo, but I'm never going back after the gamecube was so dissapointing.

[Busyman]

I use to like Nintendo, but I'm never going back after the gamecube was so dissapointing.

I usually buy em all anyway.

Things to consider....

Use the best system for multiplatform games (games that came out on all of the systems) and it's exclusives.

Any other system is good just for it's exclusives.

For instance, I only have PS2 and GC games that were exclusive to those systems. Most of my games are on Xbox. It has the fastest load time and the best graphics. A game like Need For Speed Underground II is best on Xbox.

[ApacNTS]

pretty much the same as busyman. only reason i bought the gc was for resident evils. playstation was the best when it came out, then xbox launched and well the rest is history, xboxlive is the keypoint, and good multiplayer games make it a must have system.

[maebach]

Resident Evil 4 was the best game I've ever played. It was addicting and scary, without that NGC was a dead system. If they had more Mature games and didn't focus so much on Mario I would've liked it more.

[3RA1N1AC]

is everyone aware of the news that Nintendo Revolution is going to essentially be a faster GameCube, as far as its internal parts are concerned? i read a brief interview with Nintendo Of Japan's president a while ago, where he hinted in so many words that he considered graphics to be a low priority and people should expect Nintendo to focus more upon unique input devices (like the DS stylus, the Revolution's magic-wand controller). i thought "aha! GBA was a mini SNES, DS was a mini N64, and Revolution is going to be a repackaged GameCube."

so, more recent reports finally confirm this. they're pretty much using the same microchip designs already used by GameCube, just running them at a faster speed and adding a bit more RAM. not to say that Revolution will necessarily suck, but i think it's going to really depend on how well that novelty controller works, and how well it's put to use by game-developers, 'cause Revolution is clearly not going to be a contender for best graphics (they're not even going to bother with high-definition display, apparently).

[Busyman]

is everyone aware of the news that Nintendo Revolution is going to essentially be a faster GameCube, as far as its internal parts are concerned? i read a brief interview with Nintendo Of Japan's president a while ago, where he hinted in so many words that he considered graphics to be a low priority and people should expect Nintendo to focus more upon unique input devices (like the DS stylus, the Revolution's magic-wand controller). i thought "aha! GBA was a mini SNES, DS was a mini N64, and Revolution is going to be a repackaged GameCube."

so, more recent reports finally confirm this. they're pretty much using the same microchip designs already used by GameCube, just running them at a faster speed and adding a bit more RAM. not to say that Revolution will necessarily suck, but i think it's going to really depend on how well that novelty controller works, and how well it's put to use by game-developers, 'cause Revolution is clearly not going to be a contender for best graphics (they're not even going to bother with high-definition display, apparently).

No high def? They can suck a dick.

[3RA1N1AC]

yeah, their rationale is: customers didn't use the dvd-resolution (480p) display that was available on GameCube, so why bother with high-def? but the thing is, Nintendo made it so difficult to access in the first place.

the component video cable was only available directly from Nintendo's online shop, only some games supported 480p (and only some of those supported widescreen) and the ones that didn't were unable to use the component cable at all. you'd have to fall back to the composite/svideo cable for non-480p games. then the system's menu didn't have a permanent 480p option, you just have to remember the correct button to press on the controller to activate 480p every time you boot the games.

then they finally removed the component video jack completely from the back of the GameCube's new models sometime in 2004, as a cost-cutting choice. and now they wonder why nobody used the 480p option. well gee, maybe if they'd publicized it and made it easy to use...

Nintendo's attitude toward enhanced & high-def is just baffling and eccentric.