Look at their definition for slipknot. How biased
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipknot_%28band%29
Look at their definition for slipknot. How biased
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipknot_%28band%29
I can't be arsed to read any of it, but I'm sure it's hilarious.
It's hot in Topeka.
seems pretty fair to me. why exactly do you think its biased in some way?
it defines slipknot as mallcore, which is really opinionated.
I don't see the bias you speak of, but I shouldn't worry if I were you; wikipedia is not history, after all.Originally Posted by Formula1
Time will take care of your concerns, certainly.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Well the article doesn't hold up to the "Neutral Point of View (NPOV)" of Wikipedia.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npov
I once read anrticle stating how wikipedia has been losing credibility in its entries, due to issues similar ones like these.
Sure. Accusing someone of being part of a conspiracy to assassinate the president of the U.S.A and branding Slipknot a mallcore band definitely is in the same league.Originally Posted by Formula1
I agree. A whole article and no mention that all their songs are just covers of spice girls records.Originally Posted by Formula1
it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
i read it, it does seem like a very bias opinion, but to be fair, slipknot do suck bawls
As long as I've got a face
You've got a place to sit
I've heard the same.Originally Posted by Formula1
Why do you use Wikipedia?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Bookmarks