Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Wikipedia.org are fucking c#nts.

  1. 01-15-2006, 02:21 PM #1
    Formula1
    Formula1 is offline
    Formula1's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,800
    Look at their definition for slipknot. How biased

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipknot_%28band%29
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 01-15-2006, 02:27 PM Lounge   -   #2
    DorisInsinuate
    DorisInsinuate is offline
    DorisInsinuate's Avatar Four Star Cynic
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    2,453
    I can't be arsed to read any of it, but I'm sure it's hilarious.
    It's hot in Topeka.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 01-15-2006, 03:07 PM Lounge   -   #3
    4play
    4play is offline
    4play's Avatar knob jockey
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    London
    Age
    41
    Posts
    3,824
    Send a message via MSN to 4play
    seems pretty fair to me. why exactly do you think its biased in some way?

    Bad Software
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 01-15-2006, 03:43 PM Lounge   -   #4
    Formula1
    Formula1 is offline
    Formula1's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,800
    it defines slipknot as mallcore, which is really opinionated.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 01-15-2006, 03:45 PM Lounge   -   #5
    j2k4
    j2k4 is offline
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Formula1
    Look at their definition for slipknot. How biased

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipknot_%28band%29
    I don't see the bias you speak of, but I shouldn't worry if I were you; wikipedia is not history, after all.

    Time will take care of your concerns, certainly.
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 01-15-2006, 03:54 PM Lounge   -   #6
    Formula1
    Formula1 is offline
    Formula1's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,800
    Well the article doesn't hold up to the "Neutral Point of View (NPOV)" of Wikipedia.org

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npov

    I once read anrticle stating how wikipedia has been losing credibility in its entries, due to issues similar ones like these.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 01-15-2006, 04:08 PM Lounge   -   #7
    Guillaume
    Guillaume is offline
    Guillaume's Avatar Kentish old lady BT Rep: +8BT Rep +8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    6,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Formula1
    Well the article doesn't hold up to the "Neutral Point of View (NPOV)" of Wikipedia.org

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npov

    I once read anrticle stating how wikipedia has been losing credibility in its entries, due to issues similar ones like these.
    Sure. Accusing someone of being part of a conspiracy to assassinate the president of the U.S.A and branding Slipknot a mallcore band definitely is in the same league.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 01-15-2006, 04:09 PM Lounge   -   #8
    vidcc
    vidcc is offline
    vidcc's Avatar there is no god
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,606
    Quote Originally Posted by Formula1
    Well the article doesn't hold up to the "Neutral Point of View (NPOV)" of Wikipedia.org

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npov
    I agree. A whole article and no mention that all their songs are just covers of spice girls records.

    it’s an election with no Democrats, in one of the whitest states in the union, where rich candidates pay $35 for your votes. Or, as Republicans call it, their vision for the future.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 01-15-2006, 04:12 PM Lounge   -   #9
    Proper Bo
    Proper Bo is offline
    Proper Bo's Avatar spmado BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    14,369
    i read it, it does seem like a very bias opinion, but to be fair, slipknot do suck bawls

    As long as I've got a face
    You've got a place to sit
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 01-15-2006, 04:19 PM Lounge   -   #10
    j2k4
    j2k4 is offline
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Formula1
    Well the article doesn't hold up to the "Neutral Point of View (NPOV)" of Wikipedia.org

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npov

    I once read anrticle stating how wikipedia has been losing credibility in its entries, due to issues similar ones like these.
    I've heard the same.

    Why do you use Wikipedia?
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Page Generation Time
0.04
Number of Queries
15
Links: Talkgold Forum | AdServices