Not sure zed wasn't being sarcastic, he's an artist after all, and should know something about how certain, rather good artists provoke society in all kinds of ways, and how wrong it would be if we started censoring everything everybody didn't agree with.
I think he knows all about the importance of free speech, anyhow.
Like I've stated before, I'm fairly certain the images weren't so much intended to depict the late and great mohammed as the artist saw him, but rather how the artist saw the mohammed murderers and terrorists say they follow.
And again, I think zed knows something about how subjective the interpretation of an artwork can be, and how far from the artist's intention the interpretation can fall, and how that needn't be anything that the artist should be blamed for.
As for the paper, they've claimed they published those pictures to determine whether muslim extremists had any power of the danish media.
Bookmarks