I was being harsh without apology as instructed

The twonk in question could have talked all night and still said nothing as far as I am concerned. His position was indefensible.
Apart from the occasional enraged armless mute who has not mastered typing with his toes I am not sure "free speech" really extends to beating someone to death.
Whatever happened to "sticks and stones"
Of course untruths about an individual can harm them in that it could ruin them professionally. However, the slander and libel laws are there to ensure that free speech is also accurate speech. Are the cartoons slanderous - there might be good reason for some to view Islam as a vehicle for carrying bombs. When politics and religion intertwine then all is fair game and religion cannot hide behind the skirts of sanctity.
I would agree with JP in that, with ever tightening laws, free speech appears to be an increasingly endangered commodity.
However, a democracy must have the means with which to question. If areas are allowed to be fenced off then there will be opportunities for those in power to shield their actions from criticism. This is a slippy slope that many have skated down before.
Bookmarks