boycotts of Danish goods in middle East!

[Barbarossa]

Basically they follow not so different constitution, thats why its called "union" .

do you reckon you, as a Muslim, should be held accountable for what the Taliban’s have done in the name of Islam

what the feck Taliban did, one or two clips that u saw of killing people was not more then a sentence by "SHARIAA", its done in all Islamic country even in Saudi Arabia. Its matter of East and West Thingy, the way works here and over there. one of clips that u may saw was shooting a women well that’s a couple cheating issue, wife and husband cheatings issues are a normal issue for you cuz its used regularly and no law prohibits it but in Shariaa we have strict rule over that.

Personally, I reckon someone who's daft enough to deny an event like that might need to be locked up for his own safety.

Did u see the holocaust by ur self?, how can u be so sure? As you said that media doesn’t represent the actual events so don’t trust what Hollywood’s says.
personally I think its all BS, its all to drive out the Jews Out, and to show that they don’t hate them they brought up these craps, I say if u apartheid them why don’t keep them there instead of droving them out to Middle East(what Uk did).

But I know it's not allowed to make statements intentionally intended to hurt a minority, be they Jews, Arabs or who tf cares.

How the feck doubting in something is hurting others feeling, u name that "hurting the feelings" but those cartoons which is direct arrow pointed at us is freedom of speech?

I'll tell you why....'cause the Austrians got together and agreed that a person can't deny or minimalize the 'caust.

So freedom of speech does stop at the Holocaust.

Fucked up, huh?

its similar to US Creating Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), when they nuked Hiroshima in fear of being attacked the same way and being blamed they made NPT so they can drive away those blames and be on the peace track, now European made the holocaust rule to prevent the blames from them self’s and draw a good picture of them self.

Well, now you're just talking complete crap.

But I would defend your right to talk crap against anyone who would try and take that right away from you.

[Cheese]

Am I reading that mess right. Is Bawa denying the Holocaust?

[Barbarossa]

Am I reading that mess right. Is Bawa denying the Holocaust?

[Snee]

Basically they follow not so different constitution, thats why its called "union" .

The EU, or European union is a trade union, and we don't have a common or similar constitution, what idiot told you that?

FFS, Bawa.

We all have our own, sometimes very different, separate laws.
We don't all speak the same language either, I hope you know that, at least

do you reckon you, as a Muslim, should be held accountable for what the Taliban’s have done in the name of Islam

what the feck Taliban did, one or two clips that u saw of killing people was not more then a sentence by "SHARIAA", its done in all Islamic country even in Saudi Arabia. Its matter of East and West Thingy, the way works here and over there. one of clips that u may saw was shooting a women well that’s a couple cheating issue, wife and husband cheatings issues are a normal issue for you cuz its used regularly and no law prohibits it but in Shariaa we have strict rule over that.

I saw Talibans blowing up buddhist statues, I saw Bin Laden and other Talibans claiming responsibility for planning terrorist attacks, I saw people being interviewed after the Talibans had been driven off, and they didn't seem very unhappy.

Personally, I reckon someone who's daft enough to deny an event like that might need to be locked up for his own safety.

Did u see the holocaust by ur self?, how can u be so sure? As you said that media doesn’t represent the actual events so don’t trust what Hollywood’s says.

I've seen Auswitch, I've seen where the showers were, and were the massgraves were situated. I've seen recordings of witness-statements from both germans, civilians and soldiers and non-jewish soldiers on the allied side. I've seen pictures from the camps, and heard the stories of survivors, I even saw one hold a speech, when I was very little. Saw the tattoo and all.

I daresay it would have been a logistically impossible operation, to make the holocaust as it were, up, and manage to fool everybody at the same time.

personally I think its all BS, its all to drive out the Jews Out, and to show that they don’t hate them they brought up these craps, I say if u apartheid them why don’t keep them there instead of droving them out to Middle East(what Uk did).

Personally, I think you are growing more unpleasant with every post you make.

Neither myself, nor any member of my family, nor my nation had anything to do with the creation of the state of Israel, and it's my understandning that those people who went there, went there willingly, even eagerly. Which at least in part had to do with their religion.

Furthermore, there are plenty of jews all throughout the western world, here too, whose families never left for Israel, and who most certainly were never driven out, and who, again, has the rights that everyone else does, in my country.

But I know it's not allowed to make statements intentionally intended to hurt a minority, be they Jews, Arabs or who tf cares.

How the feck doubting in something is hurting others feeling, u name that "hurting the feelings" but those cartoons which is direct arrow pointed at us is freedom of speech?

If he stands up and says it never happened, that is certainly him metaphorically spitting every survivor in the face, and a denial of the fact that they suffered.

The cartoons on the other hand, were by all accounts not intended to hurt the average muslim on the street. And, it would be a muslim bloke's right to draw the same sort of cartoons about jesus, if he felt like it, in Denmark.

And how the fook can you equate some cartoons in a newspaper critical of a religion, if that was indeed what they were, with denying something that by all accounts resulted in the death of millions?

[Cheese]

15000 atheists in London rioted after a blank sheet of paper was found on a cartoonist's desk.

[JPaul]

15000 atheists in London rioted after a blank sheet of paper was found on a cartoonist's desk.

[maebach]

the cartoon riots even spread to Nigeria!!!

http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/Story...&IssueID=28339

it says in the artical that they've changed from anti-western to anti-christian.

and the christians are fighting back, by burning mosques.


I couldn't help reading one of the articles on the site, which said a japanese preist raped 20 girls, and said if they refused, they'd go to hell I think I'm gonna start a topic soon, on how some preists do this.

[maebach]

I found this on redflagdeals.com, its arabs who hate jews, alot.

http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/spages/683165.html

[Busyman]

On another hypocritical note...

On 60 Minutes, the editor of the Denmark paper that put out the Muhammed cartoons had previously NOT put out a satirical cartoon about Jesus 'cause it would come off as offensive.

[Snee]

Watching a clip now.

First impression:

the towns are squeaky clean

^They obviously haven't been in Denmark.

Sauce

Never have I watched such a poorly investigated 60 minute report.

I am Danish, living abroad so I have the benefit of being able to read both danish news papers as well as english.

I must say that the depiction of the Muhammed crisis is flawed in many instances.

1] 60 min states that the danish newspaper would NOT show depictions of jesus. That is wrong, in fact, this has never even been mentioned. Instead, what the newspaper refused to show was the pictures that an Iranian government owned newspaper wanted to show. Depictuons of jews and in particular jews in the second world war. This would have been an offense in the danish legal system since it is illegal to make a mockery of the jews suffering during WWII.

2] The cultural editor is in Washington on vacation because he recently had an interview with CNN (in America) where he was pressed on the agende of the above pictures (Iranian). He made a wrong statement and was told to go on vacation due to stress.

3] One can buy pictures of Mohammed on the streets of Iran....(not the cartoon edition)

4] Support for the Right Wing in Denmark has NOT grown. It has stayed the same, about 20 percent, since the last election, which occured after Sep.11, and the middle class was scared.

5] The Government have actually given/sold/reserved land for a Mosque in Copenhagen. Only thing that is needed is funds, (the layout of the building has apparently already been approved, as far as I know)

6] There is an official muslim cementary outside Copenhagen.

There are numerous other points in this, especially the lies that the imams have been spreading in the middle east (for instance, it has been claimed that the Danish government was planning to release its own edited version of the Koran..not true. That Islam is illegal in Denmark, obviously not true either. 14 different muslim religions are acknowledged in Denmark by the state.)

There is so much more to this story then that 60 min clip tells. If one reads the news carefully, and from independent sources, it becomes clear that the present level of violence has more to do with internal religious groups fighting (over control with countries), that the publishing of the pictures itself.

There are many other fals claims in that segment (and information conviniently left out) but I can be bothered to explain them all.

I hope someone reads this and maybe thinks twice before accepting ne

I dunno' how right he is, but it's an interesting comment.

Secondly, what would the intent have been for publishing the christian caricatures (if they were christian at all)? I dunno' what the idea was behind those, and they definitely could have published them, according to danish law. They seem to have had some sort of idea what they wanted to do with the mohammed-cartoons, I didn't get any information about what the christian satires were intended for, if the intent was to publish them for a similar purpose it was silly to publish one and leave out the other for sure.

The editor declared responsible has shown christian caricatures after the cartoon-crisis anyhow.

Oh, and if I heard him right the reporter-person says that the editors decided to not publish the cartoons, it may not be the Flemming-bloke who's responsible for leaving one out and including the other. I dunno' if the staff was the same on both occasions, and I dunno' if one of the others is a deeply religious christian, or somesuch, who veto'ed the christian ones for personal reasons, or whatever else was the reason for it.

It's a bit sketchy.