There are a few somewhat cool ones but they are still booger flickers.Originally Posted by maebach
There are a few somewhat cool ones but they are still booger flickers.Originally Posted by maebach
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Originally Posted by Cheese
![]()
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Definition of lurker?
Yours Sincerely,
Dark Steno @ Maskawaih
A lurker is someone that follows the forum but doesn’t post.
courtesy of urbandictionary.com![]()
My favourite bit is when you put deliberate mistakes in posts like that. To cover the real mistakes you make. It's actually quite cute.Originally Posted by Busyman
Yeah wot 'e sed![]()
All spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in my post's are intentional.
Doesnt post? lolOriginally Posted by twisterX
![]()
Yours Sincerely,
Dark Steno @ Maskawaih
Originally Posted by Aaron_T
Again we see people ignoring the "subjunctive mood".
A verb is in the subjunctive mood when it expresses a condition which is doubtful or not factual. It is most often found in a clause beginning with the word "if". It is also found in clauses following a verb that expresses a doubt, a wish, regret, request, demand, or proposal.
When one makes a statement contrary to fact, one must use a conditional form of the verb, such as "weren't".
Don't worry about the grammar police here, they are just the rent-a cops of the grammar police.
I have seen such deplorable use of this mood, even among the "cognoscenti" of this forum, that I deem them all grammarian wannabes.
Aren't we in the trust tree, thingey?
what?Originally Posted by hobbes
![]()
Those who dont learn from the past are doomed to repeat It.
Bookmarks