Is the "peace-keeping" US troops in Iraq there purely for da oil?
Vote: Yep.
T__________________T
Is the "peace-keeping" US troops in Iraq there purely for da oil?
Vote: Yep.
Biostar XE T5
i5-750 @ 4.0 GHZ stable (CM Hyper 212)
2 x 2GB Cosair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHZ
Radeon 5850 @ 866/1254MHZ
Intel X25-M in RAID 0
WD Caviar Black 2TB in RAID 0
3 x Asus 25.5" VW266H LCD [Eyefinity]
Computer Abuser
BT Rep: +3
No. The reason the US is in iraq is a shell game. A diversion. The real problem is the back-stabbing royal family in saudi arabia. Plus those in power in the US with high level positions/contacts in oil.
Last edited by zapjb; 03-16-2006 at 04:34 AM.
Colonel
Yes and no. Depends on whether you're a liberal or a conservative
Yes they're their for the oil because if they weren't, the manufacturing plants and whatnot would have been overrun/destroyed a long time ago (but then again they wouldn't have been if the invasion didn't take place).
No, because if they pack up and leave, there will be an instantaneous civil war, and also if the US and UK pack up and leave they will look like cowards and become more vulnerable to attack.
Jeff Loomis: He's so good, he doesn't need to be dead to have a tribute.
Poster
BT Rep: +1
Most people believe it's the oil, but you can't be 100% sure with the U.S. and it's conspiracies.
One thing for certain though is that we shouldn't police the damn world. Besides, a world consisting of a single nation would be bland and boring. Maybe we could still do away with communism, but then are imports would be lacking. Maybe...or...just Maybe, we shouldn't be mettling with the affairs of our neighboring countries...or...present/potential Allies?
Osama Bin Laden is no excuse for the war that's been going on. For all we know, he's either dead or hideing...with a complete makeover (sex change? lol)
Democrats = For the People
Republicans = For the Money...which is bullshit in the first place.
Bush+Being Republican+Being a Moron=Bush-Shit.
Last edited by Wolfmight; 03-16-2006 at 02:06 PM.
Use Logic Or STFU!!!
Remember, we lost Vietnam.Originally Posted by cpt_azad
Yes and no. Depends on whether you're a liberal or a conservative
Yes they're their for the oil because if they weren't, the manufacturing plants and whatnot would have been overrun/destroyed a long time ago (but then again they wouldn't have been if the invasion didn't take place).
No, because if they pack up and leave, there will be an instantaneous civil war, and also if the US and UK pack up and leave they will look like cowards and become more vulnerable to attack.
Silly bitch, your weapons cannot harm me. Don't you know who I am? I'm the Juggernaut, Bitchhhh!
Flies Like An Arrow, Flies Like An Apple
---12323---4552-----
2133--STRENGTH--8310
344---5--5301---3232
Poster
i wouldnt say purely for the oil, pretty much mostly.
n00b
No they are their to rebuild IRAQ after they have bombed the shit out
off it
Travis Bickle
Poster
BT Rep: +1
spending the entire country's budget doing so
Software Farmer
BT Rep: +15
I'm not sure but was just reading about all the young Canadian boys and girls dieing every day . I don't mean to forget about all the other peace keeping forces helping , just thinking closer to home .
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks