Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Video cards: Do DVI adapters reduce picture quality?

  1. #1
    Rip The Jacker's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,236
    Hey all,

    I wanna buy a new video card, and most of the newer cards have 2 DVI ports. Like this one:



    Now, I don't have a DVI monitor (?), and would need a VGA port. Almost all cards with DVI ports come with DVI to VGA adapters (far right):



    If I use the DVI to VGA adapter for my monitor, will it reduce the quality of the picture at all? Is it worth it? Or am I better off getting a video card with a VGA port on it? Like this one (left):



    So...

    Use the DVI adapter? Or buy a video card with a VGA slot on it?

  2. Software & Hardware   -   #2
    Seedler's Avatar T__________________T
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,148
    No, I don't think visual quality is reduced when simply using a VGA adapter on a DVI port.

    It should be safe for you to go with a dual-DVI port gfx card.
    Biostar XE T5
    i5-750 @ 4.0 GHZ stable (CM Hyper 212)
    2 x 2GB Cosair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHZ
    Radeon 5850 @ 866/1254MHZ
    Intel X25-M in RAID 0
    WD Caviar Black 2TB in RAID 0
    3 x Asus 25.5" VW266H LCD [Eyefinity]

  3. Software & Hardware   -   #3
    ApacNTS's Avatar Helljumper
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Age
    40
    Posts
    860
    my card has dual dvi's and the picture is just fine with the converter's that came with it. dont see any problems at all.

  4. Software & Hardware   -   #4
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    Max resolution is 2.6 Megapixels at 60Hz (about 1860x1400). Above that the DVI interface starts using a second channel which can't be integrated into the adapter.

    However, the 5 connectors at the end (4 pins and a slot) also carry the analog signal.
    Last edited by lynx; 04-14-2006 at 10:33 AM.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  5. Software & Hardware   -   #5
    Rip The Jacker's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,236
    Quote Originally Posted by lynx
    Max resolution is 2.6 Megapixels at 60Hz (about 1860x1400). Above that the DVI interface starts using a second channel which can't be integrated into the adapter.

    However, the 5 connectors at the end (4 pins and a slot) also carry the analog signal.
    I'm sorry dude, but um... what are you saying exactly?

    Is it going to look just great? Or should I buy a card with a VGA slot?

    =/

  6. Software & Hardware   -   #6
    lynx's Avatar .
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    9,759
    The end 5 connectors (4 pins and a slot) carry the analog signal and this is what is converted on the vga adapter. There is no loss or conversion of information so the picture is just as good.

    The rest was really just saying that you may not get the card's maximum resolution on an analog signal. If you bought the card to get very high resolution (above 2.6Megapixels) then you are going to be disappointed, but that's a limitation of the analog signal and would still apply if you bought a card with a VGA connector, and since your monitor has a VGA connector it wouldn't be able to handle it anyway.
    .
    Political correctness is based on the principle that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

  7. Software & Hardware   -   #7
    harrycary's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Omaha, Ne USA
    Posts
    1,063
    in a nutshell, it will look the same using either type of video card.

    an external convertor isn't much different then what occurs on a card with both types. the convertor though may be more susceptible to interference.

    my .02¢

  8. Software & Hardware   -   #8
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    10,763
    The video performance will be the same with the adapter.

    Also the chance of interference is very low because the adapter is shielded.

  9. Software & Hardware   -   #9
    Seedler's Avatar T__________________T
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,148
    It doesn't matter much for you really.

    You could very well go with either, you prob won't use 2 DVI monitors anyways.
    Biostar XE T5
    i5-750 @ 4.0 GHZ stable (CM Hyper 212)
    2 x 2GB Cosair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHZ
    Radeon 5850 @ 866/1254MHZ
    Intel X25-M in RAID 0
    WD Caviar Black 2TB in RAID 0
    3 x Asus 25.5" VW266H LCD [Eyefinity]

  10. Software & Hardware   -   #10
    Rip The Jacker's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Age
    37
    Posts
    6,236
    Great, thanks! Sorry for the late reply, but thanks for the info guys.

    I ended up buying one that had a DVI and VGA port, I was just curious anyway.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •