so what does this proove?
1. No one can achieve 100% by replying to this thread
6. Chit chat is in fashion
8. Ratio's are low
Are thread starters more vital than those that "maintain" them?
I don't know but sometimes new threads inspire new replies
0 - 5 %
6 - 10 %
11 - 15 %
16 - 20 %
21 - 26%
27 - 32%
39 - 45%
46 - 55 %
56 - 70%
71 - 81%
82 - 94%
95 - 100%
so what does this proove?
1. No one can achieve 100% by replying to this thread
6. Chit chat is in fashion
8. Ratio's are low
Are thread starters more vital than those that "maintain" them?
I don't know but sometimes new threads inspire new replies
2.53%
13.24%
Tied for third highest w00t w00t.
Biostar XE T5
i5-750 @ 4.0 GHZ stable (CM Hyper 212)
2 x 2GB Cosair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHZ
Radeon 5850 @ 866/1254MHZ
Intel X25-M in RAID 0
WD Caviar Black 2TB in RAID 0
3 x Asus 25.5" VW266H LCD [Eyefinity]
20035/100 = 200.35
319/200.35 = 1.5%
31900/20035 = 1.5% is the same calculation.
Just add 00 to the threads and divide by the posts.
Nahh you're forgetting crycoroni.Originally Posted by Seedler
or ( thread / posts ) * 100 = same thingOriginally Posted by StephG
All the "forum stars" have like less than 5%.
Biostar XE T5
i5-750 @ 4.0 GHZ stable (CM Hyper 212)
2 x 2GB Cosair XMS3 DDR3 1600MHZ
Radeon 5850 @ 866/1254MHZ
Intel X25-M in RAID 0
WD Caviar Black 2TB in RAID 0
3 x Asus 25.5" VW266H LCD [Eyefinity]
2.51%
I'm quite surprised I have only started 136 threads.
Bookmarks