uTorrent vs. Azureus

[forinboy]

I have used both for sometime (along with a couple others) and have settled on utorrent. Its just more efficient and lightweight for me.

[bendit]

I currently use Azurues but I am considering uTorrent. I switched from Limewire to Bearshare today so I am open for a change lol

[twiter]

utorrent is the best it can be work on the 1980 s pc also.

[nadeem111as]

u torrent less resource consumption
but i prefer Azures have cool plug-ins
-------
if you use it in unix or linux it will consume less resource
we all know windows--hhhh

[ipage17]

uTorrent - less resources and it's just as good (or better) at what bitcomet and azureus were designed to do, and that is downloading and seeding.

[denniscao]

Utorrent, definetely

[vip]

Just like asking Norton vs Nod32

1 is a memory hog which uses up all resources resulting in slow pc and a pig to get off your HD.

The other is a quick,effective scanner light on resources and very user friendly.

[portnoy16]

Azureus has a nice interface, but it does waste resources.

[portnoy16]

utorrent runs smoother, I prefer using less resources and give up some of the trendy looks

[Crushacker]

I prefer Utorrent rather than Azureus but I think BitComet pwn both X_x