-
08-23-2006, 02:04 PM
#171
n00b
Azureus is better. Have more options
-
-
08-24-2006, 12:43 PM
BitTorrent -
#172
µTorrent is better, sure Azureus have more options but it eats memory as well
-
-
08-24-2006, 12:46 PM
BitTorrent -
#173
n00b
Only uTorrent is small, easy,and is the best for my broadband
-
-
08-24-2006, 02:09 PM
BitTorrent -
#174
I was using Azureus before knowing about utorrent , utorrent is my first using bitclient now .
-
-
08-25-2006, 04:21 PM
BitTorrent -
#175
Member
i've been using azureus for ages now, but im slowly being drawn by the lower mem. usage of utorrent
-
-
08-25-2006, 04:48 PM
BitTorrent -
#176
n00b
-
-
08-27-2006, 08:29 PM
BitTorrent -
#177
RETIRED
most ppl who still use azureus say its becoz it has more features. ok, true, but how many of these extra features do you actually use? none.
are those features actually worth the ressource hog? no.
-
-
08-28-2006, 08:55 AM
BitTorrent -
#178
Member
iwent from bitornado to utorrent and havent looked back,utorrrent uses a lot less memory and if ur gonna seed a torrent from another tracker it checks the data a load faster than any other client
-
-
08-28-2006, 05:45 PM
BitTorrent -
#179
n00b
Used to use Azureus, then uTorrent then back to Azureus.
Apart from resource use theres not much between the two
-
-
08-29-2006, 09:21 PM
BitTorrent -
#180
Poster
u torrent all way for me aswell , uses next to nothing resources .
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks