how are speeds in comparison, long time azureus user, but utorrent intrigues me
how are speeds in comparison, long time azureus user, but utorrent intrigues me
utorrent is great but don't forget to write_queue_size 4000
I started out with BitComet and used it for the longest time until it started getting banned. Made the switch to Azureus and liked some of the features. Then I gave uTorrent a try and never turned back. The best of both worlds.
utorrent u can't go wrong wit it
Speeds r the same. How fast you download depends on a number of factors but mainly the seeders your connected to. Your client makes no difference to download / upload speeds. But as far as the program goes, UTorrent is faster because it uses less resources and leaves a smaller footprintOriginally Posted by einstein146
UTorrent rocks...
Last edited by sear; 04-25-2006 at 07:50 AM.
Utorrent
1)extremely light(incredibly lighter than azureus which uses jre)
2)very good connection management (much better than azureus)
3)alot of options available ,basically more than anybody could ask for, from a free 350 kB prog
4)accepted from all private trackers
Azureus
1)remote monitoring using widjets
So utorrent ROCKS...(although i would like remote features...)
Utorrent rocks. Uses minimum resources and automatically decrypts p2p file transfers which is a big plus depending on yoru ISP
Bookmarks