uTorrent vs. Azureus

[tdoar]

I once used azureus, till i found out how much resources it ate

Then i switched to bitcommet till it got banned for the DHT leak problem.

finally i switched to uTorrent and i am very pleased - great functionality, low resource consumption, no *known* security leaks on public sites.

So i would have to say uTorrent!

[Shadowfire]

From my experience, uTorrent is much faster at startup and overall performance compared to Azureus. uTorrent doesn't require you to install JRE, and you don't even have to install uTorrent itself (just run the single file, and that's it). uTorrent also takes up a lot less memory than Azureus.

I know these things from experience because I just recently switched from Azureus to uTorrent, and I'm so much happier because of it.

[EcksBizzle]

both apps are great, but I go with uTorrent due to low memory consumption.

[andrew1234]

Azureus on my computer is faster and is a better program. I can never get utorrent to be like Azureus tried many times!

[Artakserksis]

uTorrent is the best torrent client out there, in my opinion. It's very light, and simple, without missing any features.

[tjewell71]

I switched from bitcomet to utorrent, but am having a hard time opening up my torrent sits. What was nice about bitcomet was you could open up 3-4 torrent sites through there site and not have 4 web pages open. Does anyone know if utorrent will do this?

[markes_do]

tested both. I prefer µtorrent, due to the small memory usage.

[kingyo]

uTorrent is much better

[alex888]

i might give utorrent a try..Azureus is good but take up too much mem.

[asthagar]

azureus