Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: George Galloway "assassination of blair would be justified"

  1. #1
    GepperRankins's Avatar we want your oil!
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    the suburbs. honestment
    Age
    31
    Posts
    21,102
    MP George Galloway has said it could be "morally justified" to assassinate Tony Blair, but stressed he was not calling for his death.

    In an interview with GQ magazine he was asked whether a suicide bomb attack on Mr Blair would "be justified as revenge for the war on Iraq".

    He said it would be morally equivalent to Mr Blair "ordering" Iraqi deaths.

    But Mr Galloway said he would not support an attack and would tell the authorities if he knew of any plot.

    Alert the authorities?

    In the interview, former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan asked: "Would the assassination of, say, Tony Blair by a suicide bomber, if there were no other casualties, be justified as revenge for the war on Iraq?"

    The Respect MP replies: "Yes it would be morally justified. I am not calling for it, but if it happened it would be of a wholly different moral order to the events of 7/7.

    "It would be entirely logical and explicable, and morally equivalent to ordering the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Iraq as Blair did."


    No politician, ever, by act, word, or deed should give any support to the notion that violence might be justified
    Sir Menzies Campbell
    Lib Dem leader

    He was also asked whether he would alert the authorities if he knew Mr Blair was to be assassinated by Iraqis.

    Mr Galloway replied: "My goodness this is a moral maze.

    "Yes, I would, because such an operation would be counterproductive because it would just generate a new wave of anti-Muslim, anti-Arab sentiment whipped up by the press.

    "It would lead to new draconian anti-terror laws, and would probably strengthen the resolve of the British and American services in Iraq rather than weaken it. So yes, I would inform the authorities."

    War crimes appeal

    Mr Galloway is standing by the controversial comments.

    In a statement, the MP said: "Like the prime minister's wife commenting on suicide bombings in Israel I understand why such desperate acts take place and why those involved might believe such actions are morally justifiable.

    "From the point of view of someone who has seen their country invaded and their family blown apart it's possible, of course, for them to construct a moral justification.

    "But I've made my position clear. I would not support anyone seeking to assassinate the prime minister.

    "That's why I said in the interview I would report to the authorities any such plot that I knew of.

    "What I did make abundantly clear to Piers Morgan in the GQ interview is that I would like to see Tony Blair in front of a war crimes tribunal for sending this country to war illegally and for the appalling human consequences which resulted. That's what I will continue to press for."

    'Disgrace'

    Later, Mr Galloway told BBC Radio 4's PM he wanted to see "mass murderer" Mr Blair jailed for life for war crimes rather than killed.

    But he said Iraqis had a right to resist the illegal occupation of their country.

    He asked: "Why would that right be restricted to the poor bloody infantry that Mr Blair sent into the streets of Iraq?"

    Downing Street has refused to comment on Mr Galloway's remarks.

    But Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell condemned the comments.

    "If Mr Galloway is being accurately reported, he could well be regarded as providing encouragement to someone who might be disposed to carry out a crime of that kind," said Sir Menzies.

    "No politician, ever, by act, word, or deed either expressly or by implication, should give any support to the notion that violence might be justified."

    Labour MP Stephen Pound told The Sun newspaper the remarks were "disgraceful".

    He said: "Every time you think he can't sink any lower he goes and stuns you again. It's beyond reprehensible to say it would be justified for a suicide bomber to assassinate anyone."

    Mr Galloway has been in Cuba this week, where he made a surprise appearance on live television alongside Fidel Castro.

    -------------------------
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5020222.stm
    -------------------------

    bizzarre. even i think it's a cunt thing to say.


    yet, i kinda agree. blair caused deaths of iraqis. it's hard to say retaliation against the person who lied so he could go into a war that killed 1000s, against the wishes of his own people wouldn't be justified

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #2
    Mr JP Fugley's Avatar Frog Shoulder BT Rep: +4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,747
    He's a sniveling git and a self publicist. Anything he does or says now is trying to sell books, or get listeners for his radio show.

    The man's a cunt.

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #3
    Rat Faced's Avatar Broken
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Newcasil
    Age
    52
    Posts
    9,076
    He's only saying exactly the same thing Chere Blair said re: Palistinians and Israeli's.

    He can understand why some would think it was morally justifiable, whilst at the same time saying he doesnt condone it.

    Cant see the problem, even if he is a total bastard.

    In fact i agree with both of them... i can understand why people could think that, even if i dont necessarily agree.

    I can think of quite a few people that i could understand being killed and the killer thinking they had a moral justification... George Galloway being one of them.

    An It Harm None, Do What You Will

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #4
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    15,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Rat Faced
    He's only saying exactly the same thing Chere Blair said re: Palistinians and Israeli's.

    He can understand why some would think it was morally justifiable, whilst at the same time saying he doesnt condone it.

    Cant see the problem, even if he is a total bastard.

    In fact i agree with both of them... i can understand why people could think that, even if i dont necessarily agree.

    I can think of quite a few people that i could understand being killed and the killer thinking they had a moral justification... George Galloway being one of them.

    So-as a result of your own moral ambivalence, you can rationalize the ultimate sanction?

    Whose moral justification qualifies?

    Good to see you've returned, BTW...
    “Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that.” -George Carlin

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #5
    Rat Faced's Avatar Broken
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Newcasil
    Age
    52
    Posts
    9,076
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4
    Quote Originally Posted by Rat Faced
    He's only saying exactly the same thing Chere Blair said re: Palistinians and Israeli's.

    He can understand why some would think it was morally justifiable, whilst at the same time saying he doesnt condone it.

    Cant see the problem, even if he is a total bastard.

    In fact i agree with both of them... i can understand why people could think that, even if i dont necessarily agree.

    I can think of quite a few people that i could understand being killed and the killer thinking they had a moral justification... George Galloway being one of them.

    So-as a result of your own moral ambivalence, you can rationalize the ultimate sanction?

    Whose moral justification qualifies?

    Good to see you've returned, BTW...
    I cant see how your confused.

    Its EXACTLY the same argument in justifying the death penalty.

    Again, i dont agree... but i can UNDERSTAND how you can feel the moral justification.

    The only "argument" is where the line is drawn in "justification". That will depend on quite a lot of variables, including where and how you're brought up, politics, culture, religion and mental health to name just a few...

    eg:

    I dont believe killing anyone by the state is justified, its legalised murder.

    At least for a relative of someone murdered, it would be vengence, i understand that.

    ergo: If you have relatives killed due to the actions of Bush/Blair, you have exactly the same "justification" as anyone else that has had a relative murdered.

    I understand that much more than cold, clinical executions by someone that wasnt involved.

    I dont condone either action.


    That make sense?


    Thanks for the welcome

    An It Harm None, Do What You Will

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #6
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    173
    The man's being honest yet people are saying "He shouldn't say this or that"

    I don't want anyone to say "Politicians are liars" ever again because it's all of you that MAKE politicians lie.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •