I didn't know what the feck spd was on about when I first read this thread, I only realised when I read your reply post about mis-spelling 'of'.
I was being genuine
effendi
I didn't know what the feck spd was on about when I first read this thread, I only realised when I read your reply post about mis-spelling 'of'.
I was being genuine
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Oh, sorry I just didn't recognise it.Originally Posted by manker
I didn't know what the feck spd was on about when I first read this thread, I only realised when I read your reply post about mis-spelling 'of'.
I was being genuine
effendi
I've dropped the disingenuousness.Oh, sorry I just didn't recognise it.I didn't know what the feck spd was on about when I first read this thread, I only realised when I read your reply post about mis-spelling 'of'.
I was being genuine
Fancied a change.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
Oh, nice. How's that working out for you like.I've dropped the disingenuousness.
Fancied a change.
effendi
Yeah, not too bad.Oh, nice. How's that working out for you like.
Altho' it's meant my harshness quotient has increased - but what can you do
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
I had noticed, it's more terseness than harshness wouldn't you say. Your suffering of fools isn't really that high.Yeah, not too bad.
Altho' it's meant my harshness quotient has increased - but what can you do
effendi
I think it's to do with me wearing no nicotine patches while in work.
I plan on beating him to death with his kids. I'll use them as a bludgeon on his face. -
--Good for them if they survive.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
That would explain it.
Software Farmer
BT Rep: +15
No, The USA are too pish to be hateworthy.
Oh and Korea have to be added to the list, for being managed by the former Count Hun, Dick Advocat.
I think thats part of my problem JP , I don't know all the details of whos coaching who now . Like Brazilians coaching the Africans or Iran .
I do know A Swede is in charge of the English . Ouch !
Last edited by peat moss; 06-14-2006 at 02:51 AM.
Frog Shoulder
BT Rep: +4
No it's actually a bit simpler / more complicated than that. The coach's nationality is not a factor. It's because he used to be the manager at hun central, nothing to do with him being a dirty orange Dutchlander. Please allow me to explain.
I do know A Swede is in charge of the English . Ouch !
Teams to support
Scotland (The Country of your birth)
Ireland (The Country of your ancestry)
Teams with Henke Larsson in them
Teams with current Celtic players in them (Except if it's Engerland)
Teams with former Celtic players in them (See above)
European Teams with a predominantly Papish tradition (Engerland rule N/A)
Other Teams with a predominantly Papish tradition (Engerland rule N/A)
Teams you just fancy supporting.
NB There will always be Teams which take themselves off this list. Portugal is a good example this year, given their level of diving (see Deco) and Ronaldo running like a total poof. The Larsson rule would automatically negate this, the current Celtic player rule may also, depending on who it is.
That pretty much covers you for most situations. I had always taken it that most people had a similar set of rules.
I hope that clears things up a bit.
"there is nothing misogynistic about anything, stop trippin.
i type this way because im black and from nyc chill son "
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks