Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Avg Vs. Nav2003

  1. 05-02-2003, 04:38 PM #1
    DarthInsinuate
    DarthInsinuate is offline
    DarthInsinuate's Avatar Died in battle
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    4,872
    i have both installed at the moment, both running
    should i keep both or just rely on one?

    at the moment i'm leaning towards AVG because its got a slightly faster scan and is slightly more legal
    The Sexay Half Of ABBA And Max: Freelance Plants
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 05-02-2003, 04:47 PM Software & Hardware   -   #2
    zapjb
    zapjb is offline
    zapjb's Avatar Computer Abuser BT Rep: +3
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,606
    Don't they conflict?
    BIGCRUMBS You deserve a BITE.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 05-02-2003, 04:51 PM Software & Hardware   -   #3
    bulio
    bulio is offline
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,143
    nav 2003, personally it is the best. i don't trust free anti viruses.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 05-02-2003, 05:08 PM Software & Hardware   -   #4
    KurtCocain
    KurtCocain is offline
    KurtCocain's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    192
    Go with the AVG man. it will do perfect work for u. get rid of the nav!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 05-02-2003, 05:52 PM Software & Hardware   -   #5
    CornerPocket
    CornerPocket is offline
    CornerPocket's Avatar Retired
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    aTx, USA
    Posts
    1,576
    Send a message via AIM to CornerPocket Send a message via Yahoo to CornerPocket
    Given the choice between just those two, I would say AVG (Nav2003 hogs pc resources).................everyone has thier opinions, I use Kaspersky.
    "8-ball Corner Pocket"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 05-02-2003, 05:55 PM Software & Hardware   -   #6
    thisiswhoweare
    thisiswhoweare is offline
    Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,229
    norton antivirus (try corporate if its hogs a lot of resources)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 05-02-2003, 07:23 PM Software & Hardware   -   #7
    ijc_2003
    ijc_2003 is offline
    ijc_2003's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    175
    norton sucks go with avg pro edtion
    everytime i install that norton 2003 it kills my comp and also trying to get rid of it to leaves files everywere.

    2ghz athlon xp
    512ddr 2100
    g4
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 05-02-2003, 07:27 PM Software & Hardware   -   #8
    ijc_2003
    ijc_2003 is offline
    ijc_2003's Avatar Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    175
    also when i done a full scan with norton it took over an 1hour 30 mins to scan where avg done it in 22mins.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 05-06-2003, 05:47 PM Software & Hardware   -   #9
    manbeast
    Guest
    AVG - NORTON CAN`T TOUCH THIS --- AVG THE BEST
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 05-06-2003, 05:55 PM Software & Hardware   -   #10
    TRshady
    Guest
    Avg wins without a doubt, much faster, less troubles and free (no, really free ).

    "Fuck the NAV, A-V-G
    Fuck the NAV, A-V-G"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Page Generation Time
0.05
Number of Queries
15
Links: Talkgold Forum | AdServices