No, I mean inform it's decisions, Ian, and to say that what I wrote was "plain daft" is just, well...daft.Originally Posted by ilw
No, I mean inform it's decisions, Ian, and to say that what I wrote was "plain daft" is just, well...daft.Originally Posted by ilw
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Whilst I am willing to accept that there may be a small number of 12 year olds who are physiologically and psychologically able to cope with a sexual relationship I would venture that they are very much in the minority.Originally Posted by Skweeky
The law is there to prevent sexual predators preying on children. These are not people who actively seek sexual relations and happen to fall for 12 year olds. They are people who actively seek twelve year olds to have sexual relations with. They do not want mature relationships, they want to have sex with minors.
Indeed this is probably why they chose 12, because they can use the specious argument that they are biologically adult and ready for sexual relations, therefore it's OK. Bollocks, it's not about their physical body it's about their emotional maturity. Not only sexually but in other ways. A 12 year old will do things for attention, or to please an adult. Who then has sex with them, but it's OK because the 12 year old consented. That's where these people want to go.
Here's what else we need to do for our twelve year olds if we have decided that they are adults. Surely that's what we are saying if we say they are ready to have sexual relations with adults.
Vote
Leave Home
Leave School
Get Employment
Join the Army
In fact do anything any other adult is allowed to. Or are they just adults where sex is concerned and children for everything else.
how can a more informed decision be a bad thing? I'm not saying that it will always result in the best outcome, but preferring an uninformed decision over an informed one
Last edited by ilw; 07-22-2006 at 11:01 AM.
Originally Posted by j2k4
Originally Posted by JPaul
Well and concisely put, sir.
I salute you.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
I liked your post regarding the Supreme Court. However, there are different ages for everything, even here.Originally Posted by j2k4
21 for drinking and smoking
15 for driving (differs in each state)
can work at different ages (mostly 16 and 18)
yet 18 is considered an adult
Just because one age is appropriate for a certain activity means shit for another.
Well and concisely put? Not by a longshot.
Last edited by Busyman™; 07-22-2006 at 03:27 PM.
Originally Posted by Busyman™
The point is that no one age for any of these activities "fits all", which point was, indeed, "well and concisely put".
Fact.
Quit looking for sharks to jump; let things permeate before you respond.
Or you could go match notes with my good friend ilw (Ian), who suffers similarly and latently.
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Originally Posted by Busyman™
There's no minimum age to smoke, you just have to be atleast 18 to buy cigarettes.
Last edited by Formula1; 07-22-2006 at 06:50 PM.
Oh well in that case there's no minimum age to drink, you just have to be 21 to drink alcohol.Originally Posted by Formula1
No sharks to jump. The point of no one age fits all is no shit but then backtracks to say that because one activity does fit that certain other ones should too.Originally Posted by j2k4
Age of consent differs in many countries from 12-20 already, btw.
Last edited by Busyman™; 07-22-2006 at 03:57 PM.
Bookmarks