So, then-
Apart from those six, if the rest of the world is afflicted with anti-U.S. (and U.K.) sentiment, then we are obviously wrong, eh?
Upon comprehensive self-examination and review, I find that I don't mind, and am further disposed to say the majority suffers a horrible misapprehension.
I daresay Hezbollah has had no interaction whatsoever with 90% of the countries you've mentioned; we, on the other hand, have had, beginning with a little incident back in 1982, which earned them our emnity.
Now, as to today's situation:
You say Lebanon is constitutionally forestalled from recognizing Hezbollah, yet we see that Hezbollah carries the fight.
Do you suppose the official Lebanese government has an understanding by which it is assured Hezbollah's more aggressive tendencies will be only outward-directed?
Do you suppose the official Lebanese government is functionally subservient to Hezbollah?
Further, do you suppose the official Lebanese government withholds sanction (the constituional aspect, it must be admitted, could be amended easily, yes?) out of some faint hope for their own future, which future they'd prefer not to include Hezbollah, or the tyranny of Syria and Iran?
If you too perceive an agenda in my questioning, I respectfully request you stow that particular impression.
Bookmarks