I got a job!

[F. Canard]

Fixed

No, no. Peerzy is far too sensible. He'd use common sense and stuff.

What I want is to continue the inconsistency trend because it's funny.

Like when mods and admin alike laughed when the naked magician pulled a thong out of her vagina and later that week, lynx closed Sam's thread because it contained a link that was against bored rules.

Ooh, I could do that, and I enjoy the schadenfraude. I'll moderate all you cunts except seedler and busyman just for a laugh.

[manker]

Okay, then. We're agreed.

Darthy, Global Jihad or Bawa for mod -- but not Peerzy because he'd be good at it.

[F. Canard]

To seal the deal: I'd ban Peerzy for being sensible.

[JPaul]

Fixed

No, no. Peerzy is far too sensible. He'd use common sense and stuff.

What I want is to continue the inconsistency trend because it's funny.

Like when mods and admin alike laughed when the naked magician pulled a thong out of her vagina and later that week, lynx closed Sam's thread because it contained a link that was against bored rules.

Caught!

That's your blunder there, mate. It must have been a fake vagina. Full frontal nudity or links to same are against board rules, so there's no way it would be allowed. Especially to a video as opposed to a picture.

To suggest they would condone it, far less encourage it is a vile calumny.

[manker]

No, no. Peerzy is far too sensible. He'd use common sense and stuff.

What I want is to continue the inconsistency trend because it's funny.

Like when mods and admin alike laughed when the naked magician pulled a thong out of her vagina and later that week, lynx closed Sam's thread because it contained a link that was against bored rules.

Caught!

That's your blunder there, mate. It must have been a fake vagina. Full frontal nudity or links to same are against board rules, so there's no way it would be allowed. Especially to a video as opposed to a picture.

To suggest they would condone it, far less encourage it is a vile calumny.

Damn, it seems very unlikely that I've made a mistake - but I must concede that the logical conclusion is that I have.

I'm sure a mod an admin Peerzy will be along shortly to clear the matter up.

[Mr JP Fugley]

Caught!

That's your blunder there, mate. It must have been a fake vagina. Full frontal nudity or links to same are against board rules, so there's no way it would be allowed. Especially to a video as opposed to a picture.

To suggest they would condone it, far less encourage it is a vile calumny.

Damn, it seems very unlikely that I've made a mistake - but I must concede that the logical conclusion is that I have.

I'm sure a mod or admin will be along shortly to clear the matter up. think "Fuck manker's right, we must discuss this in private and decide whether to ignore it or contrive to put him on moderation for a couple of days. If in doubt we can always use the old "mod decisions cannot be questioned rule" that's always a good one. Or we can break the board, they're always so relieved to have it back they forget everything else"

Fuck you're getting verbose, mate.

[manker]

:earl:

[sArA]

Congrats to rossco...

[Seedler]

Congrats to rossco...

Why the similie?