That is so 2003.
Nobody even talks about that anymore.![]()
Besides which, you are off-point.
My curiosity is piqued by not only the pseudo-alternate reality of the tack the producers have taken, but that they feel an actor with a resemblance (enhanced by the latest movie-makeup techniques), playing the part of Bush is somehow not enough to create the "necessary" impression-they must super-impose Bush's actual face on the actor.
Along these same lines, I wonder what would be the reaction to a movie about the Iranian hostage crises, wherein the leader of the terrorists is depicted as Mahmoud Ahmedinajad, and using the same technique (never mind that many of the hostages swear up-and-down that's who it really was)?
Let us further make a movie about Saddam's torture chambers, utilizing all the latest nifty techniques, and have Saddam, Uday, and Qusay joined by Osama bin Laden and Bashar al Assad in all the requisite juicy rape, torture, and murder scenes?
Hell we could even throw in Kim Jong Il, Vladimir Putin, and (for good measure) Jacques Chirac...
...or would that be too provocative?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Plenty of movies about JFK about. But then I just finished watching Dark Side of the Rainbow.
![]()
things are quiet until hitler decides he'd like to invade russia
so, he does
the russians are like "OMG WTF D00DZ, STOP TKING"
and the germans are still like "omg ph34r n00bz"
the russians fall back, all the way to moscow
and then they all begin h4xing, which brings on the russian winter
the germans are like "wtf, h4x"
-- WW2 for the l33t
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
It hits closer to home that way. what makes me wonder is if revealing that the killer is from syira is really a good idea. cirtainly, right now, the biggest terrorist danger comes from the middle east, however, we should remember that pryor to 9-11, the most deadly terrorist act in the country (oklahoma city federal building bombing) was carried out by a white american citizen. also, there are a disturbing number of home grown terror cells in the united states- I hear a lot about them since they feature on the local news here in montana. http://www.rickross.com/reference/mi...militia58.html I don't know how to go about decideing on a villian in that respect though- having a middle eastern killer ignores that there are terrorists from the united states, while having a killer from the states is kinda like saying that we are ignoring the middle eastern threat. I don't know how you would look at both- follow two main suspects maybe- one American, another middle eastern?
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
if there's archive footage in the show, it'd be kinda hard to keep track of the story if george bushes face changes completely every other shot.
remember this is a hypothetical thing, and will be presented as so. i reckon it would be ok to put any politicians in any situation as long as it's explained that it's hypothetical. except calling them gay, that's going too far
"Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."
-Mark Twain
Bookmarks