Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 86

Thread: What an incredible asshole...

  1. #41
    j2k4's Avatar en(un)lightened
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Oh, please...
    Posts
    16,300
    There has arisen in the past several days an outcry over what is generally characterized as collateral liability/culpability of various Republicans, namely Hastert and Reynolds.

    It sets me wondering where the dialogue should begin and/or end, as well as discussions of context, offense-wise.

    I have heard many comments from many pundits, and, apart from strictly rhetorical offerings, I have heard right-leaning statements bemoaning Foley's actions (as well as those of the above-mentioned names), and calling for a wholesale "heads on platters" response.

    There then follows the context which is compelled by political imperative; the various other incidents which have occurred over the years, several of them involving Democrats, most infamously Gerry Studds, Barney Frank, and Bill Clinton.

    These extended discussions, which, let's face it, are part-and-parcel of the ongoing media dissection, prompt indignant cries of "FOUL!" from Democrats who seem to prefer that historical context not be taken into account.

    Given the deplorable conduct of several Republicans vis a vis the Foley affair, what sort of propriety should apply here?

    Should all the other stuff be out-of-bounds?

    Why?
    "Researchers have already cast much darkness on the subject, and if they continue their investigations, we shall soon know nothing at all about it."

    -Mark Twain

  2. The Drawing Room   -   #42
    Busyman™'s Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Tempestv View Post
    the age in DC wouldn't seem to matter, considering the kid was somewhere else from what I can get out of the artical. what would matter is the age of consent where the kid was.
    Ok yes it matter where the act takes place. I was just saying that basically a 25 year-old fucking a consenting 16 year-old is in trouble in DC.

  3. The Drawing Room   -   #43
    Busyman™'s Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by j2k4 View Post
    There has arisen in the past several days an outcry over what is generally characterized as collateral liability/culpability of various Republicans, namely Hastert and Reynolds.

    It sets me wondering where the dialogue should begin and/or end, as well as discussions of context, offense-wise.

    I have heard many comments from many pundits, and, apart from strictly rhetorical offerings, I have heard right-leaning statements bemoaning Foley's actions (as well as those of the above-mentioned names), and calling for a wholesale "heads on platters" response.

    There then follows the context which is compelled by political imperative; the various other incidents which have occurred over the years, several of them involving Democrats, most infamously Gerry Studds, Barney Frank, and Bill Clinton.

    These extended discussions, which, let's face it, are part-and-parcel of the ongoing media dissection, prompt indignant cries of "FOUL!" from Democrats who seem to prefer that historical context not be taken into account.

    Given the deplorable conduct of several Republicans vis a vis the Foley affair, what sort of propriety should apply here?

    Should all the other stuff be out-of-bounds?

    Why?
    Can tell me wtf j2 is talking about in one sentence please.

  4. The Drawing Room   -   #44
    Busyman™'s Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Tempestv View Post
    this comes from ageofconsent.com page on Washington DC law
    CHAPTER 41 SEXUAL ABUSE § 22-4101. Definitions.

    (3) "Child" means a person who has not yet attained the age of 16 years.

    § 22-4108. First degree child sexual abuse.
    Whoever, being at least 4 years older than a child, engages in a sexual act with that child or causes that child to engage in a sexual act shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life and, in addition, may be fined an amount not to exceed $250,000. (May 23, 1995, D.C. Law 10-257, § 207, 42 DCR 53.)

    § 22-4109. Second degree child sexual abuse.
    Whoever, being at least 4 years older than a child, engages in sexual contact with that child or causes that child to engage in sexual contact shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years and, in addition, may be fined in an amount not to exceed
    $100,000. (May 23, 1995, D.C. Law 10-257, § 208, 42 DCR 53.)

    from how I read that, the law says that in a sexual relationship that involves a child, the older person must be within 4 years of the age of the child. however, the law doesn't apply after the younger person is over 16, because they are no longer a child. am I reading it wrong?

    A 16 year-old is not an adult.

    A 25 year-old banging a 17 year-old is still in trouble.

    That website smells of bull.

    edit: I love this one

    If any unmarried man or woman commits fornication in the District, each shall be fined not more than $300 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
    Last edited by Busyman™; 10-04-2006 at 09:13 PM.

  5. The Drawing Room   -   #45
    Tempestv's Avatar Engineer
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    680
    According to the CREW posting, the boy e-mailed a colleague in Alexander's office about Foley's e-mails, saying, "This freaked me out." On the request for a photo, the boy repeated the word "sick" 13 times.
    it doesn't sound like this kid was exactly consenting, which raises this to a whole new level.

    @busy, any idea what the actual text of the rules concerning this are? and I thought the law on un married fornication was good too
    Last edited by Tempestv; 10-04-2006 at 09:20 PM.
    Plan for the worst, hope for the best

  6. The Drawing Room   -   #46
    Tempestv's Avatar Engineer
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    680
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman™ View Post
    Can tell me wtf j2 is talking about in one sentence please.
    he is saying that the Democrats are crying foul about the coverup and are forgeting that Democrat politicians have done similar things in the past.
    Plan for the worst, hope for the best

  7. The Drawing Room   -   #47
    Busyman™'s Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Tempestv View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Busyman™ View Post
    Can tell me wtf j2 is talking about in one sentence please.
    he is saying that the Democrats are crying foul about the coverup and are forgeting that Democrat politicians have done similar things in the past.


    What similar things?

    Btw, can you translate and truncate er....trunslate his long postings in the future.

    Thanks in advance.

    Also, to bring up that politicians coverup shit is a bubblefuck and Captain Obvious. However, when caught, the proper response isn't "Well I may be coverupper but so are you."

    "The point is YOU covered up a gay pedophiliack, dipshit."


    Ahhh....I am recalling the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal and the importance placed on it by the Republicans.

  8. The Drawing Room   -   #48
    MagicNakor's Avatar On the Peripheral
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    5,201
    Gerry Studs - consensual sex with 17-year old page
    Barney Frank - had some hooker he hired run a prostitution ring out of his house when he wasn't home?
    Bill Clinton - consensual sex with 22-year old intern

    /saved the googling

    things are quiet until hitler decides he'd like to invade russia
    so, he does
    the russians are like "OMG WTF D00DZ, STOP TKING"
    and the germans are still like "omg ph34r n00bz"
    the russians fall back, all the way to moscow
    and then they all begin h4xing, which brings on the russian winter
    the germans are like "wtf, h4x"
    -- WW2 for the l33t

  9. The Drawing Room   -   #49
    Tempestv's Avatar Engineer
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    680
    also that Gerry Studds, Barney Frank, and Bill Clinton weren't doing unethical things with nonconsenting juvenilles.

    Gerry Studds had a relationship with a legal age male page
    Barney Frank is openly gay and had a relationship with a male prostitute, who started running a prositution ring out of Frank's apartment, which caused the end of the realtionship

    Bill Clinton got BJ's from an office intern

    damn, MN beat me to it
    Plan for the worst, hope for the best

  10. The Drawing Room   -   #50
    Busyman™'s Avatar Use Logic Or STFU!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,246
    Quote Originally Posted by MagicNakor View Post
    Gerry Studs - consensual sex with 17-year old page
    Barney Frank - had some hooker he hired run a prostitution ring out of his house when he wasn't home?
    Bill Clinton - consensual sex with 22-year old intern

    /saved the googling

    Ok now you and Tempestv are hereby annointed j2 trunslators.

    Thanks for that.

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 2345678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •