If A Person Is Pro-Life.....

[JPaul]

Why on Earth would I do that, I know what it means.

Oh good, good.

So do you justify an abortion under extenuating circumstances besides saving the life of the mother?

I have explained my position with regard to that on numerous occassions, in numerous threads. Threads which I know for a fact you have taken part in.

Either you have read my answers and are just mucking about. Or you haven't in which case why would I bother answering you again when you haven't done me the courtesy of reading it before.

[JPaul]

The ego thing interests me, all things considered. The rest doesn't make sense, this thread was over on post 10.

Yeah that happens when folks say there are mitigating circumstances without clarifying what they are.

Some fall noticeably silent and feel cornered, I guess.

You do know that he said j2 pwnd you on the first page.

[Busyman]

Oh good, good.

So do you justify an abortion under extenuating circumstances besides saving the life of the mother?

I have explained my position with regard to that on numerous occassions, in numerous threads. Threads which I know for a fact you have taken part in.

Either you have read my answers and are just mucking about. Or you haven't in which case why would I bother answering you again when you haven't done me the courtesy of reading it before.

Eh? Excuse me for not remembering the intricacies of your mitigating circumstances irregardless to abortion. Did j2 feel the same way too?

Was I to do a search for your answer from frigging 3 years (or so) ago?

Besides that, it was a simple question. You bother "mucking about" in every other instance yet clam up when a certain question comes about.

I'd understand if we just talked about the issue.

Goodnessgeewilikers.

Maybe I will do a search. I bet that those mitigating circumstances that you say you have made, don't exist.

[Busyman]

Yeah that happens when folks say there are mitigating circumstances without clarifying what they are.

Some fall noticeably silent and feel cornered, I guess.

You do know that he said j2 pwnd you on the first page.

How so? I'm thinking he meant everything went off-topic.

Not unless you are saying j2 confirmed the examples I laid out in the first post so I put my foot in mouth.

Nah he couldn't have meant that was pwnage, fer shirley.

[JPaul]

Did you read what j2 said.

[JPaul]

Do you read what anyone says.

[JPaul]

It looks more and more as if you don't

[Busyman]

Did you read what j2 said.

I see.

Oh my bad, "shoot myself in the foot".

Damn I do see that this talked about in March. I thought it would have been earlier.

And Damn, vid led off with Bill Napoli.

I'm at the part j2 is supposedly answering my question.

edit: and somewhere in a long-winded post he actually answered.

I think accomodation for incest and rape must be made

Then the child's life is not paramount when the participant in the sexual act is unwanted. There is an accomodation for the mother to have the child killed because it wasn't wanted.

[Busyman]

It looks more and more as if you don't

Nah I just went on memory. I was slightly off.

Sry.

Still no pwnage though.

[JPaul]

Cheese referred to post 10.

Did you read post 10.

One assumes not, as you are now demonstrating that you didn't read j2's other posts.

you're skimming them aren't you. Then making assumptions about what he probably said.