I did say that.
Yeah cuz that wasn't the same at all. I was simply saying that Sony would win regardless if the 360's game quality was on par with it. Again, Sony has the huge base.
This is true but there's is a reason for that..because the PS systems are better!
No PS systems were first and have always maintained a lead.
GTA VC's graphics were not great at all. FFX had great cutscenes. They both were no powerhouses.
I never said GTA had wonderful graphics.
And I'm sorry but they were both huge powerhouses, FFX was the biggest game to date with the best visual arts and GTA VC was GTA 3 but twice as big in every way.
They weren't graphical powerhouses. They were large games.
I don't know if concentrating on graphics shorted the game since it also plays well. However, they could have had the game perfect if:
1. They shoulda nixed Casual mode. The game is too easy that way and people will always start there for there first impression. They shoulda called it easy. I woulda skipped it then. Insane mode is excellent. In some cases, 3shots and you're dead. It is the perfect difficulty. Locusts are harder to take down. They are monsters they are supposed to be and not just soldiers with different skin.
Agreed 100%
I don't know how it took you even 10 hrs to complete. I finished the game in two long sittings....but that might just be my higher skill level.
What do you call a long sitting?
2-3 hrs
I don't actually know how long it took, I included while it was on so that includes piss breaks, drink breaks, homework help breaks etc.
2. They shoulda had at least 2 more levels. The game ending on the train was a bummer. (it was a nice level though)
Yeah agreed, interesting and fun level but not a "Final" level by any means.
We see that all too often in games of late.
AND WHY THE FUCK YOU DIDN'T GET TO FIGHT THE BROMAK!
Yeah would have made a good pre-final boss.
There were robberies and camping out for the 360. Sony learned from M$ about having shortages to stir up hoopla on a system. The people also learned.
For instance, I learned to get myself some PS3s since I didn't think of getting in on the 360 craze. 360 profit selling was going strong for 2 months after it launched. People remember that and jumped in (and also robbed) to get on the next bandwagon.
Thats actually a good point well made.
Okayyyyy....The PS2 didn't come out when DVDs came out. I think it was 3 years after. In the current case, they are bringing out a format with the system.
That's a big difference.
This is true but I still don't think it will take as long to come down in price because the interest will be higher. And like I said above, dvds were still at a very high price when the PS2 came out, I guess it's another thing only time will tell.
1st law of greed and business - you sell for what you think you can get. If tooooo many jump on the current price tag....it'll remain high. Ever notice that Halo was one of few games that didn't go down in price for a long time?
Keep in mind that Sony loses money on every sale of the PS3 so they will try to sustain the current price point as long as possible and drop when sales wane a bit.
I haven't beat Resistance yet. Now if that game is the same length than GOW then what? The graphics are on par with GOW if not slightly worse.
Well like I've said lots of times, Resistance is a Launch title, GOW is the flagship 1 year on. And from what I've heard resistance is a fair bit longer.
@The..... Of course the 360 pwns the Nintendo Urine.
I reckon Nintendo will be the next giant to be knocked off the gaming platform and the only thing that might save it is it's apeal to children because there are more kids games on the system.
@Mildthrill.... No, the wii is not a next gen system and no the hand thingies are nothing new as BM said, hell I had a light gun 20 years ago for my spectrum, it's the same thing.
Jonno
Bookmarks