Your Ad Here Your Ad Here
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Congress Bans Pretexting

  1. #1
    Hairbautt's Avatar *haircut
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    20
    Posts
    11,028
    New federal law supercedes state legislation

    Last week, a [U.S.] federal law was passed that will have the practice of pretexting banned across the U.S. Federal legislators almost unanimously voted for pretexting to be an illegal action, on the same level as trying to obtain someone's financial records using false pretenses. DailyTech recently reported that California was in the process of passing a similar state law, but the MPAA stepped in, lobbying that it needed pretexting in order to go after pirates. The pretexting bill SB1666 was eventually shot down after the MPAA had its say.

    Despite the small win for the MPAA in California however, the federal law passed by Congress supersedes California's laws, making MPAA's win short lived. Under the new law, anyone caught practicing pretexting will be fined up to $250,000 and face possible imprisonment for 10 years. A company caught in the act will be fined up to $500,000.

    Pretexting was previously illegal in only 12 states across the U.S. Some states had pretexting in a gray area, where consumers would try to sue if they were victims, but there were no clear lines on what was legal and what wasn't. Now that the law is clear, all states must abide by the same legislation. The new law will also now govern the outcome of those involved in the recent pretexting case against HP.

    Besides consumers, phone companies will also benefit from the new law. Consumer groups had been pushing phone companies to tighten their policies against revealing records. Generally, service providers must adhere to very strict privacy rules unless asked by a federal investigation. Some companies however, gave up records when asked by general lawyers. Phone companies must now adhere to the new law and are able to refuse record requests without trouble.

    Source: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5321
    _________________________________________________________________________________________
    Last edited by Alien5; Jun 6th, 2006 at
    06:36 PM..

  2. News (Archive)   -   #2
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    11,497
    It helps if you say what pretexting is.

    http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/pretext.htm

  3. News (Archive)   -   #3
    Hairbautt's Avatar *haircut
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    20
    Posts
    11,028

    Unsure

    Quote Originally Posted by Hairbautt View Post
    trying to obtain someone's financial records using false pretenses.
    Quote Originally Posted by Virtualbody1234 View Post
    It helps if you say what pretexting is.

    http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/pretext.htm
    It says it.
    _________________________________________________________________________________________
    Last edited by Alien5; Jun 6th, 2006 at
    06:36 PM..

  4. News (Archive)   -   #4
    Virtualbody1234's Avatar Forum Star BT Rep: +2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    11,497
    It says "on the same level as trying to obtain someone's financial records using false pretenses" which makes one think that it's similar to something else.

  5. News (Archive)   -   #5
    Hairbautt's Avatar *haircut
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    20
    Posts
    11,028
    Oh, I see what you're saying. Since it wasn't illegal before they're going to have to define it as that.
    _________________________________________________________________________________________
    Last edited by Alien5; Jun 6th, 2006 at
    06:36 PM..

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •