The Global warming blow-hards...

[Busyman™]

Please explain. I am not the first or only one to talk about about your CNP and what "other things"?

This "exclusivity" must be the entire board. You used to CNP very opinionated articles with nary point made by yourself. You've just got slightly better by adding a preface or epilogue. Usually it says, "Thie article sums up my views nicely."

Some people use facts and such articles to form their own opinion. Others post someone else's opinion and adopt it.

And still others find an article of opinion that "sums up my views nicely".

What of that, and what should be required apart from a statement signifying agreement with it's content?

If I do a total C & P, and adorn it with such an introduction, I mean to say that I find it's content agreeable, and that it is as well- or better-constructed than any effort of my own, not to mention the savings of effort and time.

Others do this sort of thing all the time, much more often than I do, and most often with even less accompanying commentary.

In my case, though, you seem to feel this signifies some sort of shortcoming.

BTW-

I have taken your advice and found an audience willing to entertain any felt need on my part to use the "N"-word.

If you stumble through the door by mistake, would I have to stop?

First off, I still duuno where you get that it's just me and Ava. We are not the first or only ones.

Second, the only time you seem to express an opinion (whenever that happens) is when it's hidden behind an opinionated article.

When pressed about a straight opinion absent of a CNP, you clam up like a cringed cunt....unless it's after 6 pages of folks asking.

It just seems you come with your opinions on here based whether or not you found a recent article. You seem intelligent but your lack of insightfulness coupled with constant piggybacking and round about wording to something simple lends me to believe otherwise.

I wouldn't have had an opinion on the whole matter just now had you not incorrectly mentioned my name.

[j2k4]

First off, I still duuno where you get that it's just me and Ava. We are not the first or only ones.

I never said it was "just you and Ava".

You were just the first one to come to mind, probably due to your relentless note of it.

There are others, I just chose not to mention them.

Second, the only time you seem to express an opinion (whenever that happens) is when it's hidden behind an opinionated article.

Utterly incorrect, but where your own postage is concerned, I find it more effective to poke holes by asking questions, which activity is exceedingly easy.

Truly, though, anyone so inclined could deduce my views from the types of questions I ask.

Your problem is getting so caught-up being offended and feeling put-upon thereby that you entirely miss the point, as well as my actual opinion(s).

I don't wonder at all why you feel the way you do; after all, I intend you to feel that way until you learn to look beyond your pique and think properly.

BTW-

You are progressing, no matter your occasional discomfort.

When pressed about a straight opinion absent of a CNP, you clam up like a cringed cunt....unless it's after 6 pages of folks asking.

You would deny me the enjoyment of stringing you along?

It also increases your appreciation of the profundity of my views, a perk I find particularly gratifying.

It just seems you come with your opinions on here based whether or not you found a recent article. You seem intelligent but your lack of insightfulness coupled with constant piggybacking and round about wording to something simple lends me to believe otherwise.

Now, this paragraph well demonstrates your own lack of insight.

I wouldn't have had an opinion on the whole matter just now had you not incorrectly mentioned my name.

While you puzzle over the propriety of my mentioning your name, I will put this thread on the "mission accomplished" pile.

[Busyman™]

First off, I still duuno where you get that it's just me and Ava. We are not the first or only ones.

I never said it was "just you and Ava".

You were just the first one to come to mind, probably due to your relentless note of it.

Relentless? I hardly note it at all. Normally when people CNP it's actually a news article and so the person may not have much to say. You post opinion articles that I wouldn't care to read anyway.....and they are quite lengthy. The last one I read was a complete waste of time. In contrast, vid may post an article that is fact based. You have posted articles that were fact based and I found them quite interesting.

There are others, I just chose not to mention them.

No shit. You mentioned me and 1234 for other reasons.

Second, the only time you seem to express an opinion (whenever that happens) is when it's hidden behind an opinionated article.

Utterly incorrect, but where your own postage is concerned, I find it more effective to poke holes by asking questions, which activity is exceedingly easy.

Truly, though, anyone so inclined could deduce my views from the types of questions I ask.

Your problem is getting so caught-up being offended and feeling put-upon thereby that you entirely miss the point, as well as my actual opinion(s).

You offend by mucking up your questions with shit like calling me "brother". Stay the direct root and you'll be okay but I know that's hard for you. I prefer to be direct rather than fuck around. We get enough of that from politicians.

I don't wonder at all why you feel the way you do; after all, I intend you to feel that way until you learn to look beyond your pique and think properly.


What's my pique?

BTW-

You are progressing, no matter your occasional discomfort.

Progressing at what? Posting style. You put much into it than I do.

When pressed about a straight opinion absent of a CNP, you clam up like a cringed cunt....unless it's after 6 pages of folks asking.

You would deny me the enjoyment of stringing you along?

Stringing along would mean that I'm actually wondering what your view is.
The problem with you is you act as if you are afraid to say it while I am not.
You post as if you are a politician at the podium of a bipartisan party.

It also increases your appreciation of the profundity of my views, a perk I find particularly gratifying.

But....your views are not profound. I won't call them shit (cuz I share some of them) but hardly profound. I think you have the ego on here that you've never had in real life.

It just seems you come with your opinions on here based whether or not you found a recent article. You seem intelligent but your lack of insightfulness coupled with constant piggybacking and round about wording to something simple lends me to believe otherwise.

Now, this paragraph well demonstrates your own lack of insight.

I wouldn't have had an opinion on the whole matter just now had you not incorrectly mentioned my name.

While you puzzle over the propriety of my mentioning your name, I will put this thread on the "mission accomplished" pile.

Now I puzzle?

If you feel better, that's all that matters, jay. Good job on accomplishing your "mission".

[MagicNakor]

I have Googled a bit more. It seems that Ava has underestimated the rise that would occur. I have found quotes(3) that say over 70 metres. Barbie does say the Arctic which would not affect the levels much because most of it is 'ice cube'.

So I have found out where the water is going to come from. Thanks Ava.

P.S. I still find the figures incredulous but will have to accept them or go to the Antarctic and measure for myself.

Thanks to all who replied.

There is also a large amount of water beneath the sea floor, and I would imagine the change in pressure and temperature to affect how much remains beneath it.

[bigboab]

I have Googled a bit more. It seems that Ava has underestimated the rise that would occur. I have found quotes(3) that say over 70 metres. Barbie does say the Arctic which would not affect the levels much because most of it is 'ice cube'.

So I have found out where the water is going to come from. Thanks Ava.

P.S. I still find the figures incredulous but will have to accept them or go to the Antarctic and measure for myself.

Thanks to all who replied.

There is also a large amount of water beneath the sea floor, and I would imagine the change in pressure and temperature to affect how much remains beneath it.

I should imagine if that 'gets out' it would be replaced by sea water.

[MagicNakor]

I believe it already is salt water... I suppose if the melting ice triggers the expulsion of this previously trapped water, the only place for the water to go...is up. Guess I will be living on the Coast again after all.

[j2k4]

I believe it already is salt water... I suppose if the melting ice triggers the expulsion of this previously trapped water, the only place for the water to go...is up.

[MagicNakor]

That's far more depressing.

[j2k4]

That's far more depressing.

Yeah.

Wood cuts will do that to you.

[Ava Estelle]

I think you have the ego on here that you've never had in real life.

Spot on.