Rat,
No, are you?QUOTE
Middle East experts say Arafat, who dislikes major rifts among Palestinians, was unwilling to risk a showdown with the increasingly popular suicide bombers, especially under pressure from Israel’s right-leaning prime minister, Ariel Sharon, who is reviled by Palestinians.
You want him replaced?
Are you mad?
I think Arafat's "interest" in the diplomatic process begins and ends with his own personal involvement.
Should Abbas be successful in forwarding the peace process, Arafat loses power.
Also, the proposed Palestinian constitution calls for the holding of free and democratic elections and the respecting of human rights, two conditions Arafat has shown zero interest in meeting.
If Arafat were sincerely interested in achieving a Palestinian state he would recognize that his continued presence is a factor in it's delay. He would publically and forcefully denounce Hamas, urge all Palestinians to support Abbas and step aside. I doubt that that will happen.
It is also due to support and aid from Syria and Iran. It would be Syria's ( a hereditary dictatorship) and Iran's (a theocracy) worst nightmare to have a democratic Arab state suddenly appear on their doorstep. As we type, students are demonstrating in Tehran and the mullahs don't seem terribly agreeable to the demands for democracy in Iran. A democratic Palestine would make their position untenable.Its the attitude of the Right Wing Israeli government and now the USA that is making the Pallestinian people more and more intollerant.
Look at the REASONS that support for Hamas is growing...its a fact that it is, but there are REASONS. Take those reasons away, and support falls off.
Take those reasons away and support may fall off, too.
Bookmarks